Before you start this paper please see the attached for issues from last paper. For this component of the SLP please explain the implications of this problem for the stakeholders of the organization (be sure to compare and contrast the implications for the different stakeholders). Among these, you are asked to give special attention to patients. ASSIGNMENT EXPECTATIONS Length: This assignment should be between 1-2 pages (250-500 words) in length, excluding references. References: At least two references should be included from academic sources (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles). Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper Format: APA format is recommended. While APA formatting of references is not a requirement, the references need to be presented in order using a standard citation style (APA, AMA, MLA etc). When material is copied verbatim from external sources, it MUST be enclosed in quotes. The references should be cited within the text and also listed at the end of the assignment in the References section. See Syllabus page for more information on APA format. Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted, assignments are expected to adhere to standards guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity. The following items will be assessed in particular: Achievement of learning objectives for assignment Relevance (e.g. all content is connected to the question) Precision (e.g. specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are specific and accurate). Depth of discussion (e.g. present and integrate points that lead to deeper issues) Breadth (e.g. multiple perspectives and references, multiple issues/factors considered) Evidence (e.g. points are well-supported with facts, statistics and references) Logic (e.g. presented discussion makes sense, conclusions are logically supported by premises, statements, or factual information) Clarity (e.g. writing is concise, understandable, and contains sufficient detail or examples) Objectivity (e.g. avoid use of first person and subjective bias)
Huey
For this Module 1 SLP you are asked to further discuss the extent and the impact of this problem. How often is it encountered? What are its negative consequences? Who is affected by the problem? What could be its implications for the mission and vision of the healthcare organization where the problem occurs?
Length: This assignment should be between 1-2 pages (250-500 words) in length, excluding references.
References: At least two references should be included from academic sources (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles).
Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper
Good points – Thank you for this submission. Your paper’s cover page and citation requirements were met.
About the content – I WAS GLAD TO SEE A DISCUSSION ON CHRONIC DISEASES AND IT’S IMPORTANCE IN RELATIONSHIP TO SERVICES PROVIDED. THE DEGREE TO WHICH ORGANIZATIONS AND SYSTEMS FOCUS ON PARTICULAR SERVICES GREATLY VARIES.
Improvement Points – In reviewing your submission this is what you can do to improve – Requirements of this submission include:
* Read the Expectations listed under each assignment to help you earn maximum credit. PLEASE CUT-AND-PASTE THE EXPECTATIONS AND INCLUDE THEM AFTER THE QUESTIONS THAT ARE CUT-AND-PASTED.
Please use sub-headings in the body of your submission. The sub-headings should contain key words from the questions posed. Your response should immediately follow the sub-heading in your submission.
SINCE THIS IS A RESEARCH PROJECT TRY TO KEEP TO A MINIMUM OF TWO PAGES FOR EACH SUBMISSION – THANK YOU.
About the content – I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU INCORPORATE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS INTO YOUR SUBMISSIONS. YOU SHOULD DESCRIBE WHAT SERVICES ARE BEING RENDERED IF CHRONIC CARE SERVICES ARE NOT BEING RENDERED.
Relationship to Practice – These concepts are important as your career progress. THE PATIENT TO STAFF RATIO PLAYS AN IMPORTANT PART IN SERVICES RENDERED.
Include thought provoking question – IS CROSS-TRAINING APPLIED IN THE INSTITUTION THAT YOU ARE RESEARCHING? HOW CAN CROSS-TRAINING BENEFIT PATIENT OUTCOMES?
Summary –
ORGANIZATION
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to organize content logically, concisely, and in a manner appropriate to the assignment was:
Adequate - Minor organizational flaws are apparent in the document.
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to support a central point or viewpoint throughout the document was:
Marginal - Limited elaboration and/or support in the document.
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to effectively use transitions to aid the reader’s comprehension was:
Adequate - Transitions guide the reader through the text of the document.
CONTEXTUAL AWARENESS
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to express one’s intended purpose clearly and consistently in writing was:
Adequate - Clear purpose, but not consistently sustained throughout the document
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to present information to varying audiences in such a way that the information is meaningful to that group was:
Marginal - Limited sense of the needs of the audience.
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to discover, assemble, evaluate, and explain competing ideas or explanations was:
Adequate - Effectively presents, explains, and analyzes competing ideas or explanations, but doesn’t clearly relate back to the central theme or viewpoint in the document.
Your ability to demonstrate breadth and depth of understanding of the assigned topic in writing was:
Marginal - There is evidence of a broad based understanding of the central theme or viewpoint, but no evidence of an in- depth understanding in the document.
KNOWLEDGE OF CONVENTIONS
Your ability to demonstrate the use of standard written English was:
Adequate - Few errors and no interference with the comprehension of content within the document.
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to use appropriate sentence structure within the document was:
Adequate - Sentence structure is appropriate to purpose and audience.
SOURCES AND EVIDENCE
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to appropriately incorporate quality, relevant sources in support of ideas within the document was:
Marginal - Attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. PLEASE OBTAIN REFERENCES FROM PROQUEST OR STRONG SEARCH ENGINES. INCORPORATE PEER-REVIEWED / EVIDENCE BASED REFERENCES TO FURTHER STREGTHEN THE CONTENT.
Your ability to demonstrate the ability to properly cite in-text citations and record them on the list of references was:
Adequate - Cites all in-text citations, but fails to use a consistent format; does list sources on reference page, but is inconsistent in format.
I am encouraged with the scholarly work that you have submitted.
Please follow my feedback and incorporate it into future submissions.
I am confident that your work will improve further in the next module.
I look forward to reading your next module’s papers!
Let me know if you need help.
Dr. Constantine
Grade - B