Jul 28, 2017

What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes?

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Research Critique - Health and Medicine

I will make the pay when i get home left my card at home am at work at this time at around 8PM tonight AZ time Assignment Research Critique, Part 1 View Rubric Due Date: Oct 20, 2013 23:59:59 Max Points: 150 Details: Prepare a critical analysis of a qualitative study focusing on the problem statement, study purpose, research question, literature review, and theoretical framework. The completed analysis should be 750-1,000 words. Refer Research Critique, Part 1. Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. NRS433V.v10R.ResearchCritiquePart1Guidelines_student.docx Research Critique, Part 1 To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, respond to each of the questions listed under the headings below. Do not answer the questions with a yes or no; rather, provide a rationale or include examples or content from the study to address the questions. CRITICAL APPRAISAL GUIDELINES: QUALITATIVE STUDY Problem Statement Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem. How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. Purpose and Research Questions Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions? Literature Review Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include? Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study. Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies? Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? Conceptual / Theoretical Framework Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it? When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings? Research Critique, Part 1 1 Unsatisfactory 0%-71% 71.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75% 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 76%-83% 83.00% 4 Good 84%-94% 94.00% 5 Excellent 95% - 100% 100.00% 80.0 %Content 20.0 % Research problem and purpose Does not mention research problem or purpose of study. There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem. The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate. The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing. The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing addressed. 20.0 % Research objective, questions or hypotheses Does not mention objections, research question (s) or hypotheses. There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses. The research objective, questions or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate. The research objective, question or hypotheses are described and related to study methods. Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher. 20.0 % Literature Review Does not mention literature review. There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review. The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study. The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described. The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question. 20.0 % Frame of Reference (qualitative) Does not mention frame of reference There are some inaccuracies describing frame of reference. The frame of reference elements are present and mostly accurate. The frame of reference is described. The frame of reference is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology. 15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. 5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5.0 %Format 2.0 % Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 100 % Total Weightage
Research CritiqueNameUniversityDate   Research critiqueIntroductionThis article documents a study that was carried out majorly on the case of colorectal cancer and the issues revolving around follow up care that comes after the period of treatment. Qualitative methods were also appropriate to answer the research questions. This paper seeks to document a research critique of the above article in terms of problem statement, study purpose, research questions, literature review, and conceptual framework. Problem statementThere is a need to provide appropriate access for meeting clinical, psycho-social and information needs. Nurse-led clinics and telephone follow-up care by specialist nurses may be effective models of care for these patients after treatment for colorectal cancer. It is necessary to identify a clear way that will enable exploration of the perceptions of the patients on their experiences with follow up the care system, most especially after colorectal cancer treatment.Study purposeThe purpose of this study is identified in a clear way so as to be able to explore the perceptions of the patients on their experiences with the idea of following up the care system, especially after the treatment of colorectal cancer. The original purpose of the study was adequately addressed in this paper. Research questionsThe research questions addressed in the paper were: Does traditional hospital follow-up always address patients` psycho-social and information needs? And Are nurse-led services more effective models of follow-up care for patients with colorectal cancer?The purpose of the study and research questions is related to the problem. Qualitative methods were also appropriate to answer the research questions.Literature ReviewA literature review was carried out to establish the amount of study carried out majorly on the case of colorectal cancer and the issues that revolve around follow up...

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions

International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120

100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now


We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout