Jul 23, 2017

What dominant notions about culture, land, oceans and people of Hawaii have been challenged, changed, or reinforced through this course (cultural anthropology)?

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of What dominant notions about culture, land, oceans and people of Hawaii have been challenged, changed, or reinforced through this course (cultural anthropology)? in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Key Concepts in Sociocultural Anthropology


Write a paper on the following question that touches on both themes: 1. What dominant notions about culture, land, oceans and people of Hawaii have been challenged, changed, or reinforced through this course (cultural anthropology)? 2. How did the Anthropological concepts learned in the course re/shape your perceptions about the culture, land, oceans, and people of Hawaii? In order to write this paper, you must include: - At least six citations from at least 6 different chapters from the Book: "The Value of Hawaii" - Discuss about 3 of the following concepts: race, class, gender, age, notions of "the Other," the importance of historicizing social behavior and practices, or any other topic covered in the course. For example, you should not simply discuss "gender" as a euphemism for "women" or as the dichotomy between male/female-instead you must reflect the nuanced understanding about sex, sexuality, gender, power, and culture as discussed in the course in the textbook. The same holds for race, class, "the Other," etc. Please make sure the three Anthropological concepts are in BOLD font, like this (e.g. The Native Hawaiian concept of le`a shaped gender (bold word) perceptions prior to colonial contact.."

Key concepts in social-cultural anthropologyInsert name:Institution affiliation:Due date: Hawaiians believed that there was a relationship connecting the existence of sea, land, nature and the universe. This connection originated from their genealogical and spiritual beliefs. For Hawaiians, nature was the phenomenon where all such interactions and existence emanated. They considered themselves as children of nature or land. They believed that land was the core aspect of life rather than mere dirt, sand or soil. Hawaiians believed that land developed deep emotion that grew from ancestral period when they inhabited the islands (natural land). They believed that land was a fundamental aspect for human survival. According to Jonathan (2004), cultural anthropology has been utilized as important tool which enabled Hawaiians understand and learn many issues about their past experiences. Furthermore, cultural anthropology helped Hawaiians to sustain and conserve their culture. Cultural anthropologists explored Hawaiian ethno-history and redeveloped this traditional history as an important aspect for Hawaiians. The determination to engage Hawaiians in issues concerning cultural resource management issues began in the past. Cultural anthropologists have been advocating for collaboration between anthropologists and native Hawaiians. Anthropologists are external agents who helped to analyze cultural aspects in a more indigenous way which enabled native Hawaiians gained more knowledge and understanding their communities and culture. Cultural anthropologists examined Hawaiian ethno-history and refined the traditional history of the Hawaiian communities. Environment was vital for human survival and therefore topics like resource sustainability, social organization as well as sustenance strategies were examined through studying scientific and cultural issues (David and Elizabeth, 2010). Anthropologist professors at the University of Hawaii were determined to involve many Hawaiians students study anthropology as a way of engaging other native Hawaiians in the society to culturally manage their resources effectively. There has been cultural misunderstanding between native Hawaiians and anthropologists concerning unethical archeological tasks, inappropriate treatment of human remains and their opposing agendas. The native Hawaiians considered appropriate treatment of human remains as not involving archeological analysis and excavation of the remains. Rapport and Overing (2000) opine that such political and social strife emanated from the manner in which archeologists involved in Hawaiian archeological artifices and sites without getting consent from the native Hawaiians. Native Hawaiians tribes concerned with way in which human remains and other related artifacts were disposed and treated. Such new realities demanded that archeologists de...

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions

International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120

100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now


We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout