This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Topic: Critique of Research Studies: Statement of the Problem in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Topic: Critique of Research Studies: Statement of the Problem

Instructions:

Apply Rubrics

Critique of Research Studies - Part 1

1

Not submitted

0.00%

2

Unsatisfactory

75.00%

3

Less Than Satisfactory

80.00%

4

Satisfactory

88.00%

5

Good

92.00%

6

Excellent

100.00%

70.0 %Content

7.0 %Quantitative Title and Abstract

None

Critique is missing for quantitative research title and abstract.

Critique incompletely or incorrectly addresses guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is not supported with relevant evidence.

Critique addresses some guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Parts of the critique are supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses most guidelines and criteria for a quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for the quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

28.0 %Quantitative Introduction: Statement of the problem, hypotheses or research questions, literature review, and conceptual framework/theoretical framework

None

Critique is missing for all quantitative introduction components.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

7.0 %Qualitative Title and Abstract

None

Critique is missing for qualitative research title and abstract.

Critique incompletely or incorrectly addresses guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is not supported with relevant evidence.

Critique addresses some guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Parts of the critique are supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses most guidelines and criteria for a qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for the qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

28.0 %Qualitative Introduction: Statement of the problem, research questions, literature review, and conceptual underpinnings

None

Critique is missing for all qualitative introduction components.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

20.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

None

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

None

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

None

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Follow the instructions provided in "Critique of Research Studies Instructions."

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NUR504.Critique of Research Studies Instructions_Student_1-09-14.docx

Content:

Critique of Research Studies

Name

Institution of affiliation

Date

Critique of Research Studies

Quantitative

The role of nurses in the recognition and treatment of patients with sepsis in the emergency department: A prospective before-and-after intervention study

The title is good noting that it recognizes the key phenomenon under study as the role of nurses in the specified medical condition. It also specified that the study looks at the situation before and after the study.

Abstract

The abstract clearly and concisely summarizes the key components of the study. It correctly provides the background context leading to the study. Noting that there has been a global initiative to decrease mortality owing from Sepsis. This initiative, however, does not include the role of the nurse. The abstract also provides objectives for the study. It also notes that participants are patients (adults above 16 years) coming to 825 patients. It notes that the study methods includes measuring compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommendations. It notes that the intervention mechanisms

...

Topic: Critique of Research Studies: Statement of the Problem

Topic: Critique of Research Studies: Statement of the Problem

Instructions:

Content:

100% Pass Guarantee

STILL NOT CONVINCED?