2019-01-24T10:31:47+00:00
Topic: Candler v. Persaud Medicine Case Study Assignment
This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Topic: Candler v. Persaud Medicine Case Study Assignment in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Topic: Candler v. Persaud Medicine Case Study Assignment Instructions:
Read the case study, "Hospital`s Duty to Ensure Competency" on pages 183-184 in the textbook. 2) Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) that addresses the case study`s two Discussion prompts. Include a detailed rationale for your answers. 3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. 4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Content:
Candler v. Persaud Case Study Name: Institution: Course Title: Instructor: Date: Candler v. Persaud Case Study Background Information on the Case The Candler v. Persaud Case involved the petition filed by a patient against Candler general Hospital. The patient was referred to a physician named Dr. Freeman in order receive consultation as well as treatment of gallstones about or on February 15, 1990. Having undergone consultation, the physician recommended that such patient should undergo a procedure referred to as laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Dr. Freeman was fully granted the privileges of performing such procedure on the patient upon his request to do so. Such privileges were granted to the physician based on the certification from the workshop he had completed earlier on the procedure. Upon performing the procedure on the patient, the patient bled to death. As a result, the patient’s estate’s administrator filed a case alleging that the procedure was negligently performed, resulting to the bleeding and death of the patient. The administrator held that the hospital negligently granted the physician with the privileges of performing the procedure without having established an technique for judging on whether the physician was competent to perform the procedure or not. This research paper sought to provide a description of credentialing issues i
...
Get Fresh Answer: £40 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions