This paper concentrates on the primary theme of To understand the importance of crowd management and to identify the ramifications associated with inadequate crowd management and crowd control. in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 79. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

-Main theme/purpose

To understand the importance of crowd management and to identify the ramifications associated with inadequate crowd management and crowd control. Event coordinators assume liability if an event turns into a chaotic episode for whatever reason. For example, a fight breaks out at a nightclub, someone pulls out a gun and starts shooting. An innocent bystander falls as a result of the commotion and gets trampled on and killed instantly. If there is inadequate crowd management, more than likely the club will be fined or shut down. In essence, this study`s main objective is to examine inadequate crowd management, review legal documentation about the positive/negative impact of crowd management, identify who may be liable for any damages i.e. bodily harm, and damage to possessions, etc., and to make recommendations on how to enhance crowd management procedures to minimize adverse effects of the loss of control of a crowd.

- Research questions/Hypotheses
? Will integrating an event management plan assist management in gaining more control over crowds?
? What strategic techniques should be utilized when implementing a new plan?
? How would a new event management plan contribute to preventative measures or pre-crisis assessments?
? What are some inclusive preventative tactics event management should be aware of?

- Background literature to support research

The background literature supporting this document included a plethora of documented cases that illustrates crowd management and crowd control issues and circumstances. Each case was unique and pertinent to the current study. Each case was utilized as a form of a benchmarking analysis to determine what legal precedence considers the assumption of risk of attending an event and if management should be held accountable due to negligence of safety procedures, liability in the event an individual is harmed or property is damaged. These cases illustrate who was at fault, some cases were in favor of the defendant and others were in favor of the plaintiff which presents a slippery slope in most cases for the reason that the plaintiff would have a responsibility of foreseeing any possible damage and act accordingly to prevent a dangerous situation from occurring. The cases outlined in this article includes the following: