This paper concentrates on the primary theme of The Linkage Between Trade and Environment in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 79. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Does free trade harm the environment?
Environmentalists argue that trade liberalization harms the environment. The decisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in particular have been the subject of much criticism.
Carbaugh1 has described environmentalists` three primary assertions:
Trade liberalization leads to a "race to the bottom" in environmental standards.
Trade liberalization conflicts with morally-conscious environmental policies.
Trade liberalization encourages trade in products that create global pollution ("pollution havens").
Proponents of trade liberalization argue that freer trade might actually improve the quality of the environment. For example, the international environmental policy of the U.S. and other industrial nations is based on the "polluter-pays principle."
This approach is intended to give producers the incentive to develop more pollution-control techniques.2
Carbaugh, Robert J. International Economics, 10th edition. Mason, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western. 2005.
In this project, you will recreate and evaluate the arguments and counter-arguments for all three of the environmentalists` assertions described above.
Part 1: Recreate the arguments/counter-arguments
MAKE BELIEVE YOU ARE A GROUP, recreate the arguments for and against the three assertions noted above (six arguments total).
You will as if you have two other mates.You being A, then B, and C
Each choose one of the six arguments and present the argument .
Approach this assignment as an exercise in critical thinking. Your goal is to represent a party`s argument as accurately and as thoroughly as possible.
For each argument , present the following information:
The party you represent
Your party`s interests or objectives
Your party`s assertion
Each counter-argument, present the following information:
The party you represent
Your party`s interests or objectives
Your party`s assertion
A summary of the available evidence that supports your party`s assertion and/or examples that illustrate the assertion.
Feel free to use the Cybrary or other Web resources to help recreate the arguments.
Part 2: Summarize and evaluate the arguments/counter-arguments
Collaborate to write a 4-5 page document in which you:
Summarize each argument and counter-argument. Be sure to note the relevant parties in the debate and their interests/objectives.
Evaluate the arguments and counter-arguments. Be sure to address the following questions:
Can the conflicting positions in these debates be resolved? If yes, how? If not, why not? Your answer should be well-reasoned and supported with examples.