This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Single European Law in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 79. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

The development of the European Union has not lead to the creation of a single European Law replacing the national laws. Instead the European Union focuses on the harmonization of national laws only to the extent that is required for the functioning of the Common Market and the principles of free movement. In many fields, the Member States maintain thus different legislations, creating a competition between their legal systems.

Taking example on the case law in the field of free movement, explain whether you think that this legislative competition creates a "race to the bottom", i.e. weakening legal protections and guarantees, or a "race to the top".

See attached file for full problem description.

Even if I share your opinion, could you please try to show why some nevertheless argue that the EU can lead to a race to the top.

Just try to explain what reasoning they adopt, and say why they did not convince you.
Could you propose some solutions for the problems you mention.

Can there anything be done about this race to the bottom, or is is inevitable?