Jul 20, 2017 Research papers

When Objects Become Parts

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of When Objects Become Parts in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

When Objects Become Parts


Peter van Inwagen argues that no good account of what it is for some objects (as parts) to compose another object (as a whole). Van Inwagen`s argument is an argument by cases, which leaves open that there is some other account of what it is for some objects x_1, x_2, ... x_n to compose another object y. Present and assess one or two accounts of such composition that van Inwagen doesn`t consider.

This website is a summary of what van inwagen thinks: http://philosophyafterdark.com/2012/07/comments-on-van-inwagens-when-are-objects-parts/

However, PLEASE DO NOT write according to that website or please do not paraphrase or cite. Please only use my text book (i will attach the pages)

Also, please follow instructions keenly please! I will also attach (how to write a philosophy paper) All the instructions are in there. So please read carefully and follow.


When objects become parts Student: Professor: Course title: Date: When objects become parts The argument presented by Van Inwagen is really an argument of cases that leaves open that there is some other account of what it is for some objects to compose another object. In this paper, two accounts of such composition that Peter Van Inwagen does not consider are presented and assessed comprehensively. These two accounts are contact and fastening. It is argued in this paper that fastening and contact offer an answer to the Special Composition Question. Van Inwagen defines composition in two stages: first, he states that y is the sum of the xs only if the xs are parts of y and each part of y overlaps – that is, shares a part with – at least 1 of the xs; and secondly, the xs compose y only if y is the sum of the xs and no 2 of the xs overlap (Van Inwagen 628). An answer to the Special Composition Question (SCQ) would tell when or under what conditions, composition really took place. Composition and parthood are slightly interdefinable. Given composition, Van Inwagen defines parthood as: x is a part of y only if there are zs such that the zs and x compose y. An object x is, in essence, a proper part of something only if there are zs, and one of which is not x, such that x and the zs compose something (Van Inwagen 629). Van Inwagen presents several possible answers to the SCQ. (1) Contact: this is the first possible answer to the Special Composition Quest...

0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120

100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now


We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout