Writing a Rhetorical Précis as an Annotated Bibliography
Prior to the five-sentence paragraph base, you must include the following source information conventions:
Last Name, First Name, Book, Publisher City: Publisher, Date.
Last Name, First Name, Article, Periodical, Volume, Number, Date.
Webpages must include the date it was accessed on.
Note variations of these standards when combined, and consult LRC reference sheet.
1. Sentence one provides:
a) the name of the author, the genre (essay, novel, etc.), and the title of the work with the publication date (in parenthesis), a concise appropriate verb (claims, argues, exams), followed by;
b) a “that” phrase in which the thesis of the work is stated (either paraphrased or quoted).
In [_______________________________]’s [_____________], [_______________________________]
author’s full name kind of source title of source
[(___________)], [_____________] [_____________] that [__________________________________].
publication date author’s last name verb like “argues” thesis of the work
2. Sentence two provides an explanation of how the author goes about supporting his/her thesis or main idea. Remember that brevity is important – you will not restate the details from the work, but explain the rhetorical method used by the writer to develop these supports.
By [_______________________________]ing [_____________________________________________]
verb how the author supports the thesis and what kind of evidence is used
pronoun or author’s last name what the author is able to accomplish in the source
3. Sentence three states the purpose of the piece (which may reflect the thesis, but should also include the writer’s motives – why the author is writing this piece?). This is accomplished with an “in order to” phrase.
The author’s (His or Her) purpose it to [___________________________________________________]
in order to [_________________________________________________________________________].
author’s goal or motivation
4. Sentence four explains the author’s intended audience and how the author positions the ideas or thesis with that audience.
[___________________] positions himself as [_____________________________________________]
author’s last name how the author positions himself/herself
and wants to reach [__________________________________________________________________].
audience for the source
5. Sentence five depicts how the source is relevant or applicable to your developing ideas.
how the work is relevant or applicable to your own ideas
6. Following the above five-sentence base, your annotated bibliography must also include additional sentences that incorporate a discussion on:
Text to Self: Something in the Text that applies or changes you (Self)
Text to World: Something in the Text that applies or changes the greater community or society (World)
Text to Text: Something in the Text that applies or relates to another text or precedent idea (Text)
7. In addition to the written component above (1 through 6), after the annotated bibliography (ann bib) you must also include:
Visualization: A visual image, collage, or descriptive component that conveys an aspect of both the text and your ideas.
WEEK 2 PRECIS DP Name Institution Date Pink, Daniel H. A Whole New Mind. New York: Riverhead Books, 2005. In Daniel H. Pink’s, book, “A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the world,” (2005), Pinks, argues that the world will change from the knowledge information age to the conceptual age, characterized with creators and empathizers. By referencing changes in the society, Pink highlights that material abundance, automation and the emergence of Asia as a low cost provider will precipitate societal changes, with the less emphasis on analytical and linear thinking compared to creativity. Pink seeks to emphasize the importance of creativity and design in shaping the society in order for people to appreciate this to improve the economy. Pink positions himself as a scholar who wants to reach out to educators urging them to develop and appreciate creativity, as they appreciate the benefits of right-thin