This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Topic: Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco: Facts Leading up the Dispute in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Topic: Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco: Facts Leading up the Dispute
In your report, identify the following if observed: a. Identify the Court b. Parties to the Action c. Facts Leading up the Dispute d. Issues e. Witnesses (Expert & Ordinary) f. Attorneys (Names) g. Evidence (Type) Submitted h. Judge` s Role & Decision Attorneys name was Manpreet S. Bains for the Respondent/Defendant, other party had no attorney. For the rest of the information look at the file DV-120 Declaration. For judges decision read the file titles court order 10/26/16 and for witness statements see the document titles Xaviers supporting declarations.
Name Course Instructor Date Court: Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco Defendant/Respondent: Xavier Keone Neves Facts leading up the Dispute Crystal Hunter Bidou (26 years), a former wife to Xavier Keone Neves (30 years) met Neves on the 26th day of September 2016 for their exchange of Cerissa at Balboa Park at 6.30 pm. The petitioner alleges that Mr. Neves harassed her in the presence of her daughter Cerissa (5yrs) and Layla (2years). The two entered into a disagreement which turned to be very verbal when Xavier questioned Crystal why she did not allow Cerissa to go for Xavier`s family trip which was organized by the sisters of Xavier. Ms. Crystal alleges that Xavier had not disclosed the relevant information in regard to how long Cerissa was going