This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Topic: Long-Arm Jurisdiction Research Assignment Paper in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Topic: Long-Arm Jurisdiction Research Assignment Paper
read the following cases: International Shoe v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945); and Lindgren v. GDT, LLC, 312 F. Supp.2d 1125 (S.D. Iowa 2004). Write a 500 (2 pages) word summary of where the courts stand on long-arm jurisdiction, specifically emphasizing websites and long-arm jurisdiction and whether there should be a difference between websites and other methods of conducting business in more than one state.
Every legal body or court operates within certain parameters known as jurisdiction. This is the legal limits within which the court should entertain matters. Jurisdiction therefore are boundaries beyond which a court is not permitted to overlook unless with justifiable exceptions. One of the justifiable expectations is what is known as long-arm jurisdiction (Jennings, 2012). This is when the court goes beyond its jurisdiction and crosses over to a foreign or international juris