This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Topic: Legislation and Programs Relating to Social Equity for Women in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Topic: Legislation and Programs Relating to Social Equity for Women
Debate Topic: Legislation and Programs Relating to Social Equity for Women
Due Friday by 10am Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Available Oct 19 at 9pm - Oct 28 at 10am 9 days
THIS IS A `THINKING` ASSIGNMENT REQUIRING YOU TO EITHER AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH A CONTENTION, PRESENTED BELOW, USING SOCIOLOGICAL REASONING (I.E. THE APPLICATION OF CONCEPTS AND THEORIES YOU HAVE ENCOUNTERED THUS FAR IN THIS COURSE) TO MARSHAL SUPPORT FOR YOUR CHOICE. (HINT: THERE ARE ANY NUMBER OF SUCH CONCEPTS AND THEORIES ALREADY ENCOUNTERED THAT CAN BE UTILIZED. AT AN ABSOLUTE MINIMUM, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO TAP ONE OR MORE THAT RELATE TO STRATIFICATION, SOCIALIZATION, AND, SOCIAL STRUCTURE.)
BEGIN BY SPECIFICALLY STATING YOUR AGREEMENT OR DISAGREEMENT WITH THE CONTENTION. THEN, BUILD YOUR CASE BY DRAWING ON AS MANY SOCIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS AND THEORIES AS SEEM USEFUL FOR YOUR PURPOSES IN DEVELOPING YOUR ARGUMENT. UNDERLINE YOUR FIRST USE OF THESE CONCEPTS AND/OR THEORIES TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT YOU ARE USING IT. SHOULD NO SUCH CONCEPTS APPEAR IN YOUR ESSAY, IT WILL RECEIVE A GRADE OF NO MORE THAN TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT (25%). IN OTHER WORDS, YOUR ESSAY MUST BE SOCIOLOGICALLY GROUNDED AND NOT SIMPLY A DISCOURSE OFFERED WITHOUT SUPPORT.
IF, SOLELY IN MY JUDGMENT AND WITHOUT AN OFFER OF EXPLANATION FOR MY DECISION, YOU PRODUCE AN ESSAY OF OUTSTANDING QUALITY, EXTRA CREDIT OF AN UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT WILL BE AWARDED. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT, IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR THIS EXTRA CREDIT, THE ESSAY MUST USE PROPER GRAMMAR AND BE FREE OF MISTAKES IN SPELLING.
Here is the contention to which you are to respond.
The idea of a `glass ceiling` simply has no practical meaning in the American society of 2016. After all, a woman has secured the Democratic Party`s nomination for President of The United States and there have already been several female Secretaries of State in the administrations of Presidents from each of the two major political parties. There are also numerous women in high-prestige occupations such as law, medicine and the professorate. Indeed, more women than men are completing higher educations with the intent of entering fields traditionally associated with males. Females have entered the top ranks of management as well, even in some of the Fortune `Top 500` corporations. General Motors, for example, is headed by a woman. Likewise, many universities and colleges are being led by a female President. Clearly, the argument that women are somehow discriminated against in our society is without merit and, for this reason, no `special provisions` of a programmatic or legislative nature should be considered for them. In fact, any such legislation now in place should be reversed in such a way that no reference to one`s sex is made at all.
This is a based opinion paper! Dont use citations it`s all based on point of view!
Legislation and Programs Relating to Social Equity for Women Name: Institution: Date: Legislation and Programs Relating to Social Equity for Women I disagree with the contention that the glass ceiling on women issues should be overlooked and swept under. The miniature changes and achievements of some women who have shattered the glass ceiling is a concerted effort by many women who paid the ultimate sacrifice in the past and refused to play by the rules for future generations to achieve gender equity. Statistics and facts portrayed by the contention are some of the extra ordinary cases