2019-01-23T10:42:00+00:00 Assignments

Topic: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Assignment Paper

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Topic: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Assignment Paper in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Topic: Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Assignment Paper

Instructions:

Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay

Sources 1. Professor Sherry Ginn`s critique:1 http://www.clas.ufl.edu/ipsa/2003/ginn.html 2. Professor Naomi Hetherington’scritique: http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/hether.html

1. Evaluate the critic/author: Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have (education, professional career, other publications, etc.)? (If you are using a credible author, you should be able to find her/his credentials fairly easily) 2. Find the thesis of the article: What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein? 3. Evaluate the thesis: Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen. 4. Evaluate the support: Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly? Next, locate a second critique about the novel, and discuss how this second critique agrees and/or disagrees with the first one. For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, does the second critic agree with this assessment? If the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, does the second critic concur? These are just a few examples of how you can include this second critique in order to have a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay of your own. In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims are supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen, the novel, Frankenstein, and/or the study guides. Using proper MLA2 style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them. Hint: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein? You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement: (Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support). OR (Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support). More specific thesis examples: John Smith uses "Frankenstein Critique Essay" to adequately argue that Victor`s mother created the first monster by coddling Victor as a boy. OR John Smith`s "Frankenstein Critique Essay" does not effectively argue that Victor`s mother created the first monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible.

Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information: Your first and last name Course Title (Composition II) Assignment name (Frankenstein Application Essay) Current Date FORMAT: MLA-style source documentation and Works Cited Your last name and page number in the upper-right corner of each page Double-spacing throughout Standard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri) Title, centered after heading Save the file using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph. Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph. Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.

Content:

Name Course Title: Composition II Assignment name: Frankenstein Application Essay Date Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein focuses on interaction between Victor Frankenstein and his creation the Creature, which comes about after experimenting. The Creature desired to interact with a mate, but this was impossible and he unable to form meaningful relationships. Hence, the Creature seeks to revenge against its creator who was uneasy about the hideous character. The main reviews of Frankenstein have been scientific, religious allegory, and feminist themes. However, Frankenstein is also an autobiography work. Sherry Ginn uses Frankenstein’s critical essay to argue that Mary Shelley’s novel is more of an autobiographical piece of work rather than a science fiction. Sherry Ginn is a Professor of Psychology at Wingate University, North Carolina and also the Director of the Women’s

...


0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout