This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Topic: Critical Response Writing Assignment: Working at McDonalds in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Topic: Critical Response Writing Assignment: Working at McDonalds
We need 2 parts for this assignment.
For part 1, this is a summary. Summarize in 150-200 words the article your instructor has chosen from the assignment. Please use "Working at McDonald`s" on pages 260-262 of your 10th edition textbook (or pages 280-283 of your 9th edition book). In this summary, you should relay the article’s main points, completely and accurately, in your own words. If you find yourself in a situation in which the author’s words needed to be quoted directly (perhaps for emphasis), you must make it clear that these words are the author’s by using quotation marks appropriately. You will not want to quote anything over one sentence in length, and you will want to limit yourself to no more than 2-3 direct quotes, if you use any at all. Remember that the whole point of this portion of the assignment is for you to restate the author’s points objectively in your own words.
In general, I recommend you structure your first sentence something like this:
In "Working at McDonald`s," Amitai Etzioni argues that...
This will function as the thesis statement of your summary, so this first sentence will need to convey the main point(s) of the article to give your reader an overall view.
For part 2, this is a critical response. Write a 1 ½ to 2 page response to the article your instructor has chosen from the assignment. Please use "Working at McDonald`s" on pages 260-262 of your 10th edition textbook (or pages 280-283 of your 9th edition book). Before you even begin drafting, you will want to decide on the terms of your response. Once you decide on the terms (or grounds) of your response, you’ll want to figure out how you can support your points—using logic, outside evidence—whatever is appropriate. Your response cannot be based on simply your opinion about the issue.
For the critical response, while you may not just focus on your personal beliefs, you do have the following options in terms of the grounds of your response:
*EVALUATING THE LOGIC OF THE ARGUMENT
*RECOGNIZING EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION
*JUDGING THE WRITER`S CREDIBILITY - This includes questions related to the writer`s "knowledge," "fairness," and use of "common ground".
Working at McDonalds Name: Institution: Date: Part 1: Summary In "Working at McDonald`s," Amitai Etzioni argues that teenage jobs do more harm than good. He has described some of the reasons he thinks teenagers are better off schooling than working in fast foods restaurants. In his observation, teenage jobs do not offer the necessary platform for creativity, initiatives and basic elementary arrangements and rearrangements necessary to help them grow holistically. He has pointed out the factors that the teenagers are subje