Jul 22, 2017 Research papers

The merits of the RCT

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of The merits of the RCT in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

The merits of the RCT (RES 500 Case)

INSTRUCTIONS:

Health science researchers have long believed the randomized controlled trial (RCT) to be the “gold standard” of study designs. There are many reasons for their contention that an RCT should be preferred to any of the observational study designs. However, there are also instances in which employment of this design would be inappropriate. In a four-page paper, discuss the merits of the RCT as a study design with regard to: Internal validity Confounding Feasibility/appropriateness External validity You are expected to consult the scholarly literature in preparing your paper; you are also expected to incorporate relevant background readings. Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your levedisl of understanding. In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials. Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list. Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely. Length: 4 pages typed, double-spaced.

CONTENT:
RES 500 CaseInsert name:Institution affiliation:Due date: It is a fact that certain research methods are more significant than others based on the capability to address respond to questions on the efficiency of interventions. It has led to the ranking of evidence, which evaluate outcome of interventions and shows, which research designs need to be given the most priority. According to Bowling and Ebrahim (2005), the Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is regarded to offer the most reliable evidence on the efficiency of interventions since the processes adopted during the performance of an RCT reduces the challenges associated with confounding factors that influence the outcomes. Due to this, the findings established by RCT are much closer to the appropriate impact than the findings developed by other research techniques. Health science researchers prefer using RCT because it provides the most powerful evidence on the efficiency of treatments or interventions. For example, a school district intended accurately to analyze whether the new development curriculum for the teaching profession is more efficient than the existing district curriculum. The district may conduct an RCT that randomly designates teachers either to a control group that utilizes the existing curriculum or an intervention group that gets the new curriculum. The RCT would evaluate the outcomes like test results of their students or content knowledge of the teachers for both the two groups after a period of time. The different results between the two groups would signify the impact of the new curriculum in relation to the existing curriculum. An RCT refers...


0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout