Jul 17, 2017 Research papers

Systematic Review Delirium in the ICU

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Systematic Review Delirium in the ICU in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Systematic Review Delirium in the ICU


A recent article, from the last 3 to 5 years, in a peer reviewed nursing journal that includes articles using a SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Topic: Delirium in the ICU

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper analyzing key elements of the article, and discuss the article’s potential impact on clinical practice. APA format, not needed running head.

Systematic Reviews 

PLEASE include the questions in APA 


• Did the report clearly state the research problem and/or research questions? Is the scope of the project


• Is the topic of the review important for nursing?

• Were concepts, variables, or phenomena adequately defined?

• Was the integration approach adequately described, and was the approach appropriate?


• Did the report clearly describe criteria for selecting primary studies, and are those criteria reasonable?

• Were the bibliographic databases used by the reviewers identified, and are they appropriate and comprehensive?

Were key words identified, and are they exhaustive?

• Did the reviewers use adequate supplementary efforts to identify relevant studies?

• Was a PRISMA-type flow chart included to summarize the search strategy and results?


• Were inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly articulated, and were they defensible?

• Did the search strategy yield a strong and comprehensive sample of studies? Were strengths and

limitations of the sample identified?

• If an original report was lacking key information, did reviewers attempt to contact the original researchers

for additional information—or did the study have to be excluded?

• If studies were excluded for reasons other than insufficient information, did the reviewers provide a

rationale for the decision?


• Did the reviewers appraise the quality of the primary studies? Did they use a defensible and well-defined

set of criteria, or a respected quality appraisal scale?

• Did two or more people do the appraisals, and was inter-rater agreement reported?

• Was the appraisal information used in a well-defined and defensible manner in the selection of studies, or

in the analysis of results?


• Was adequate information extracted about methodologic and administrative aspects of the study? Was

adequate information about sample characteristics extracted?

• Was sufficient information extracted about study findings?

• Were steps taken to enhance the integrity of the dataset (e.g., were two or more people used to extract

and record information for analysis)?


• Did the reviewers explain their method of pooling and integrating the data?

• Was the analysis of data thorough and credible?

• Were tables, figures, and text used effectively to summarize findings?


• Did the reviewers draw reasonable conclusions about the quality, quantity, and consistency of evidence

relating to the research question?

• Were limitations of the review/synthesis noted?

• Were implications for nursing practice and further research clearly stated?


Systematic review Delirium in the ICU Name Course Instructor Date Ahmed, S., Leurent, B., & Sampson, E. L. (2014). Risk factors for incident delirium among older people in acute hospital medical units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and ageing, 43(3), 326-333. THE PROBLEM The authors stated the research problem focusing on understanding the risk factors for incidences of delirium, Data synthesis through systematic reviews and Meta analysis were relied upon to identify the risk factors among older patents. The topic of delirium in the ICU and acute care settings is important to nurses since it goes under-recognized. Even though, screening is an important tool which helps to improve healthcare outcome, nurses do not always perform screening for delirium. Ahmed et al (2014), identified all the risk factors that could cause delirium after conducting a review of previous studies, as they adapted the range of risk factors depending on whether risk factors had been considered by previous studies. The approach was adequate as the researchers were able to pool information on the various delirium risk factors, synthesizing the broad range of data available to highlight on the most prevalent risk factors mentioned. According to Reade and Finfer (2014), patient


0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120

100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now


We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout