This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Review Assignment: Chosen the Specific Test Statistic in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Review Assignment: Chosen the Specific Test Statistic
Having developed the null and alternative hypotheses in the previous module, write a 2- to 3-page essay in which you:
Identify a test statistic to help you assess the evidence against the null hypothesis you developed in the previous module.
Explain why you have chosen the specific test statistic. Include in your discussion description of the test statistic.
Summarize your findings by creating a summary graph in which you display your data.
Discuss the total number of measurements (sample size), the possibility for measurement error, and whether it is large enough to paint an accurate picture.
SLP Assignment Expectations
Use the information in the modular background readings as well as resources you find through ProQuest or other online sources. Please be sure to cite all sources and provide a reference list at the end of the paper. Submit the paper as a Word document through the link provided for the assignment.
Length: 2–3 pages typed and double-spaced.
Your Case paper will be further evaluated based on the following criteria:
Precision (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
Each question and or assignment requirement is addressed in the paper.
Accuracy of your answers, key points and supporting discussion
Clarity (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
The paper is well organized, concise, reads clearly, and it is not confusing.
Breadth (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
The paper presents appropriate breadth covering the assignment questions/requirements.
Depth (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
Presents key points that lead to deeper matters and issues.
Integrates several points into coherent conclusions.
Critical Thinking (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
The paper demonstrates good understanding and synthesis of the module background material.
Logically incorporates key concepts presented in the background material into the overall analyses, key points and supporting discussions.
Presents well-reasoned conclusions and position as well as convincing arguments in support of the same.
Grammar (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
Spelling (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
Vocabulary (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
Referencing (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
Additional considerations to keep in mind while working on your Case Assignments:
Originality and Use of directly quoted material
The purpose of each assignment is for you to present your understanding and synthesis of the background material and key concepts. Accordingly, this must be accomplished substantially in your own words.
Use directly quoted material sparingly and only when preserving the exact words of an author is necessary. For purposes of this course, rarely should directly quoted material represent more than 5 percent to 10 percent of your entire case paper’s content. Composing a paper patched together from mostly quoted material is not acceptable.
Be sure to properly reference all directly quoted material and include the in-text citations. All paraphrased information also requires reference citations at the end of the paraphrased section.
Name Institution Date Minutes spent exercising. The information will be gathered by starting a timer at the start of my exercises and stopping the timer when finished. Monday- 120 minutes Tuesday- 60 minutes Wednesday- 120 minutes Thursday- 60 minutes Friday- 120 minutes Saturday- 150 minutes