This paper concentrates on the primary theme of How can organizations and vendors change their certification programs to test for skills as well as core knowledge? What issues might this introduce? in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
When Certification Is Justified
When Don Tennant, former editor-in-chief of Computerworld, published an editorial in favor of IT
certification, he was promptly hit with a barrage of angry responses from IT workers.66 They
argued that testable IT knowledge does not necessarily translate into quality IT work. A worker
needs good communication and problem-solving skills as well as perseverance to get the job
done well. Respondents explained that hardworking IT workers focus on skills and knowledge
that are related to their current projects and don’t have time for certifications that will quickly
become obsolete. Many readers indicated they suspected that vendors offer certification simply
as a marketing ploy and a source of revenue. They accused managers without technical backgrounds
of using certification as “a crutch, a poor but politically defensible substitute for knowing
what and how well one’s subordinates are doing.”67
Any manager would certainly do well to review these insightful points, yet they beg the
question: What useful purposes can certification serve within an organization?
Some CIOs and vice presidents of technology assert that many employers use certification
as a means of training employees and increasing skill levels within the company. Some
companies are even using certification as a perk to attract and keep good employees. Such
companies may also enhance their employee training programs by offering a job-rotation
program through which workers can acquire certification and experience.
Employers are also making good use of certification as a hiring gate both for entry-level
positions and for jobs that require specific core knowledge. For example, a company with a
Windows Server network might run an ad for a systems integration engineer and require a
Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) certification. A company that uses Siebel customer
relationship management software might require a new hire to have a certification in the
latest version of Siebel. In addition, specific IT fields, such as project management and security, have a greater
need for certification. As the speed and complexity of production increase within the global
marketplace, workers in a variety of industries are showing an increasing interest in project
management certification. With mottos like “Do It, Do It Right, Do It Right Now,” the Project
Management Institute has already certified more than 400,000 people. IT industry employers are
beginning to encourage and sometimes require project management certification.
Calls for training in the field of security management go beyond certification. The demand
for security workers is expected to continue to grow rapidly in the next few years in the face of
growing threats. Spam, computer viruses, spyware, botnets, and identity theft have businesses
and government organizations worried. They want to make sure that their security managers
can protect their data, systems, and resources.
One of the best-recognized security certifications is the CISSP, awarded by the International
Information Systems Security Certification Consortium. Yet the CISSP examination, like
so many other IT certification examinations, is multiple choice. Employers and IT workers alike
have begun to recognize the limitations of these types of examinations. They want to ensure
that examinees not only have core knowledge but also know how to use that knowledge—and a
multiple-choice exam, even a six-hour, 250-question exam like the CISSP, can’t provide that
Other organizations are catching on. Sun Microsystems requires the completion of programming
or design assignments for some of its certifications. So, while there is no universal
call for certification or a uniform examination procedure that answers all needs within the IT
profession, certifying bodies are beginning to adapt their programs to better fulfill the evolving
needs for certification in IT.
- How can organizations and vendors change their certification programs to test for skills as
well as core knowledge? What issues might this introduce?
- What are the primary arguments against certification, and how can certifying bodies change
their programs to overcome these shortcomings?
- What are the benefits of certification? How might certification programs need to change in
the future to better serve the needs of the IT community?