Jul 18, 2017 Research papers

How can coevolutionary gaming facilitate group decision making?

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of How can coevolutionary gaming facilitate group decision making? in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

MGT501 MOD3 Case: Coevolutionary gaming


Read the article referenced below from the Harvard Business Review about a simulation technique used by the Department of Defense to facilitate strategic planning. The author points out how this same technique can be used by a number of businesses as well.

Required Reading

This article can be found in the EBSCOHost collection, Academic Search Complete database.

Cares, Jeff; Miskel, Jim. (2007). Take Your Third Move First. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 85 Issue 3, 20-21.


Write a 4- to 5-page paper with an introduction, conclusion, section headings, and references that answers the following questions:

  1. How can coevolutionary gaming facilitate group decision making?
  2. What are its limitations?

Keys to the Assignment

The key aspects of this assignment that should be covered in your paper include:

  • Define the problem: Explain how this strategic planning tool can be used to improve decision making. Be specific and use terminology and concepts from the background readings.
  • Analyze the cause: Discuss how coevolutionary gaming would affect communication processes using the Johari window, and/or how it can impact group decision biases such as risky/cautious shift and groupthink.
  • Propose a solution: Describe a situation in which coevolutionary gaming might impede decision making.

Assignment Expectations

Your paper will be evaluated using the following five (5) criteria:

  • Assignment-Driven Criteria (Precision and Breadth): Does the paper fully address all Keys to the Assignment? Are the concepts behind the Keys to the Assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements? 
  • Critical Thinking (Critical Thinking and Depth): Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?
  • Business Writing (Clarity and Organization): Is the paper well written (clear, developed logically, and well organized)? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included in all papers? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding to the Keys to the Assignment, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations? 
  • Effective Use of Information (Information Literacy and References): Does the paper demonstrate that the student has read, understood and can apply the background materials for the module?  If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality (library?) sources? Do additional sources used in paper provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper? 
  • Citing Sources: Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing, by inclusion of proper end references and in-text citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all end references been included within the body of the paper as in-text citations?



Stew-mgt501-mod3-case Name Institution Date Introduction Coevolutionary gaming is an actual pragmatic means for group decision making particularly where risk issues and improbabilities are great. It is an exceptional situation of planning process, as postulated by Jim Miskel and Jeff Cares in their work “Take Your Third Move First,” that fundamentally develops from the dispute that planning and ensuing decision making ought not to be done in a vacuum. According to Jeff and Jim (2007), while forecasting using the contemporary and chronological data in order to make decisions, it is not prudent to assume that the recipients of the effects of the decisions made will never react. This theory further, advances that decisions made in such ways are myopic and do not regard those who will be affected neither does it consider their reactions. Problem Jeff and Jim (2007) warn that, the aftermath of decisions made in a “vacuum” could have considerable negative effects, especially, if it is done with an aim of maintaining the status quo. For instance, consider an entrepreneur who ge


0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120

100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now


We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout