This paper concentrates on the primary theme of How are they different and why is the difference important in regard to death investigation? in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 45. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Serial, Mass, Spree, and Sexual Murderers Discussion Board
The terms, “serial killer,” “mass murderer,” “spree killer,” and “sexual murderer” get thrown around in the media and television as if they are synonymous. How are they different and why is the difference important in regard to death investigation? Please justify your answers. Be sure to support your opinions with credible research and to cite and reference your sources in APA style. Remember, writing mechanics count in every post you make.
HERE IS A LINK TO HELP:
Deaths and Serial Crimes
While most deaths are determined to be from natural causes,
accidents and suicides are also frequently investigated in an MLDI office with
most offices only occasionally investigating homicides. The available facts, forensic,
and medical evidence are often all that is needed to determine the cause and
manner of death in routine cases. However, on occasion a case involves limited
or confusing facts that make the determination difficult; often these cases
include death scenes that have been altered or staged. These are called
equivocal death scenes.
An equivocal death is a death in which the cause of death can be
determined but the manner of death is still in question. The most common of
these cases are homicides staged as suicides or suicides staged as homicides.
These cases can result in guilty persons not being caught, innocent parties
being jailed, and the inability for families to have closure or to receive
financial- or property-related death benefits. Other equivocal deaths may
include deaths where a cause or manner can’t be determined because of the state
of the body (skeletal remains, decomposition, no body) or due to alterations
made to the crime scene by persons wanting to hide evidence or confuse the
manner of death.
An equivocal death investigation consists of two parts: 1) an
analysis of the original case to determine if errors occurred and if so, 2) an
investigation of all aspects of the victim’s life pertinent to the death
(victimology), a reconstruction of the crime to determine possible manner of
death, and an analysis of the behaviors of the perpetrator(s) at the scene to
determine a possible motive for the crime and attempt to identify suspects.
While serial crimes are rarely equivocal deaths, they may suffer
from some of the same problems in their investigation. These crimes may feature
bizarre or deviant behavior at the crime scene, they may include aspects
introduced to confuse the crime scene and to enable the suspect to elude
capture, and they may involve multiple cases spread over time or involving
multiple jurisdictions—some spread over large distances. In these cases, it is
possible that a killer can have many victims that have not been identified as
part of a series. Often with these cases, it is the ME/C office that recognizes
the similarity between cases. This is because ME/C offices often have staff
members who remain in their positions for many years, some completing their
whole career in one office. That office may also serve a large jurisdiction
policed by several law enforcement agencies. In these instances, the consistent
factor in the investigations will be the ME/C and the death investigators. They
may be the first to recognize a pattern of deaths based on injuries to the
victim or factors at the scene.
In cases of serial crimes, equivocal deaths, and cold cases, it is
a best practice to have a team or task force bringing a wealth of knowledge and
perspectives to the investigation. These types of cases are good candidates for
behavioral analysis, previously referred to as “profiling,” to assist
in understanding victimology and possible motivations of the killer(s). This
process may be able to determine new leads and new suspects but will also be
able to determine areas of investigation not to pursue or types of suspects
unlikely to have committed the crime that aids in focusing the suspect field.