Jul 18, 2017 Research papers

Health Research Essay

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Health Research Essay in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Health Research Essay

INSTRUCTIONS:

Topic 3 DQ 1 

3, Describe the quantitative design of the article you selected. Present the strengths and limitations of this type of design according to the textbook and how these are reflected in your study. Contrast the design you have selected with at least one design presented by a classmate in one of your responses.



Topic 3 DQ 2 

2, Describe the qualitative design (or methodology) of the article you selected. Present the strengths and limitations of this type of design according to the textbook and how these are reflected in your study. Contrast the design you have selected with at least one design presented by a classmate in one of your responses.

References

Ludmila, M., Teresa, P., Adam, W., and Slawomir, C. (2013). Perceptions of an older patient on

the role of the family doctor in health promotion: A qualitative case study. Journal of 

Medical Case Reports, 1-5.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186%2F1752-1947-7-57

Saarikoski, M., Kaila, P., Lambrinou, E., Pérez Cañaveras, R. M.,Tichelaar, E., Tomietto, M., & Warne, T. (2013). Students` experiences of cooperation with nurse teacher during their clinical placements: An empirical study in a western European context. Nurse Education inPractice, 13(2), 78-82.



PLEASE Contrast the design you have selected with at least one design presented by a classmate in one of your responses …



THIS IS FROM A CLASSMATE BELOW. FOR DQ 1.



Re:Topic 3 DQ 1

In the article, Assessment of efficacy and safety of combining “paclitaxel” eluting balloon and “limus” eluting stent in the same lesion, Basavarajaiah et al. (2013) performed a study in which they looked at using a drug-eluting balloon and drug-eluting stent together for treatment of coronary artery blockages. The design of the study was as follows:

-A group of patients (155) between 2009 and 2011 had percutaneous interventions (PCI) performed. The initial strategy was to use only a drug-eluting balloon (DEB), which is a relatively new treatment for coronary lesions.

-If the drug-eluting balloon alone was not sufficient to adequately reduce the stenosis, then “bail-out” stenting was performed to keep the artery open. The researchers determined whether of not to use a bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) for bail-out.

-The determination for bare-metal vs. drug-eluting stent was made based on factors that categorized the patient as high-risk or not. High-risk patients received the DES the patients with less risk received BMS.

The goal for the researchers was to determine if the DEB/DES treatment was safe and efficacious. The randomization of treatment (DEB alone, DEB/BMS, DEB/DES) was effectively dictated by the patient’s comorbidities and coronary pathophysiology, as well as intra-procedural findings. The patients were then followed up later and data was collected with regard to clinical outcomes based on pre-determined categories. This data was analyzed and it was determined that the use of the DEB/DES combination was safe and efficacious.

I believe that this experiment was a randomized controlled trial. There were three groups treated in different ways (DEB alone, DEB/BMS, DEB/DES) with the emphasis being on determining if the DEB/DES combination was safe and effective. Per Polit & Beck (2012), the 3 factors that make up a true RCT are manipulation, control, and randomization. In this study, all patient groups had interventions performed (manipulation). Controls and randomization were dictated by comorbidities, coronary pathophysiology, and intra-procedural findings. According to Polit & Beck (2012), this is considered the “gold standard for yielding reliable evidence about cause and effect”.



Basavarajaiah, S., Latib, A., Hasegawa, T., Rezq, A., Takagi, K., Naganuma, T., &

Colombo, A. (2013). Assessment of efficacy and safety of combining "paclitaxel"

eluting balloon and "limus" eluting stent in the same lesion. Journal Of 

Interventional Cardiology, 26(3), 259-263. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2013.12010.x



Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for

nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwers Health | Lippincott

Williams & Wilkins.

CONTENT:

Health Research Essay Institution Date In the article, Perceptions of an older patient on the role of the family doctor in health promotion: qualitative case study concerns the evaluation of the opinions of the older patients towards the health services offered by the family doctors. The design of the study will be as follows: The study explored the experience of patients aged 65 years and above. Purposive sampling followed in order to maximize data variation on basis of age, gender, education and health problems. Data saturation was reached after 30 interviews. These results comprised of 18 women and 12 men, aged 65 to 87 years. Out of this sample size, 7 participants had basic education, 7

...

0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout