Jul 14, 2017 Others

Garner Et Al

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Garner Et Al in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Garner Et Al

INSTRUCTIONS:
Write an organized response to Garner et al.`s "Common Use of PowerPoint versus the Assertion-Evidence Structure." In your response, state the reading, the author(s)` argument, and the main points. Discuss what lessons you draw from the reading, why you think it is important and how it relates the subject matter of the course or other course concepts.



Your assertions about the reading should be properly supported by evidence from the reading. For example, if you think the argument is x, then explain what brought you to that conclusion. If I can see why you think something (i.e., if you provide me evidence of your thought process), even if you are incorrect about the reading, the critical thinking is what is important, but I can only see it if you support your points.





Only use quotations from the reading when absolutely necessary to support your claims. Refrain from excessive quotations. Summarize the material in your own words.



Be sure to review the rubric.



Rubric:

Content: I am assessing your critical thinking skills, your ability to recognize and explain an argument and main points in relation to the readings, and your ability to connect the readings to larger contexts (e.g., your own work or career goals or social issues). Responses should demonstrate a critical engagement with the reading by grappling with the ideas and concepts. Your responses should be in your own words and not rely heavily on quotations. If quotations are absolutely necessary, they must be explicated and explained.



Your assertions about the reading should be properly supported by evidence from the reading. For example, if you think the argument is x, then explain what in the reading brought you to that conclusion.



Organization: Responses should have a clear and logical hierarchy of information or presentation of ideas.



Style and Diction: Responses should follow a clear and concise style. Appropriate diction.



Grammar and mechanics: Responses should be free of punctuation, grammatical, and spelling errors.
Show All


Small Content:
 
CONTENT:

Garner et al.`s "Common Use of PowerPoint versus the Assertion-Evidence Structure Name Course Instructor Date Garner et al (2009), sought to establish whether the assertion-evidence structure of the slide design enabled the audience to recall information compared to the PowerPoint slides. Through presenting the same information using the two different approaches it was easier to compare resu

...

0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout