Jul 21, 2017

Executive Summary

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Executive Summary in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Executive Summary

INSTRUCTIONS:

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (850-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make their decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include:



The purpose of the program or project.

The target population or audience.

The benefits of the program or project

The cost or budget justification.

The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated.

Share your written proposal with your manager, supervisor or other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Request their feedback using the following questions as prompts:



Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?

What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal?

Submit the written proposal along with the "Executive Summary Feedback Form."



Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.



This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.



Rubric



Executive Summary (Benchmark Assessment) 



1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less than Satisfactory

75.00%

3

Satisfactory

79.00%

4

Good

89.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

80.0 %Content



16.0 %Executive summary addresses the purpose of the program or project

The purpose of the program or project is not provided.

The purpose of the program or project is incomplete, missing relevant information.

The purpose of the program or project is provided and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.

The purpose of the program or project meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

The purpose of the program or project meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, is provided in detail, and demonstrates higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

16.0 %Executive summary addresses the target population or audience

The target population or audience is not addressed.

The target population or audience is incomplete, missing relevant information.

The target population or audience is provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.

The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

16.0 %Executive summary addresses the benefits of the program or project

The benefits of the program or project are not provided.

The benefits of the program or project are incomplete, missing relevant information.

The benefits of the program or project are provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions

The benefit of the program or project meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

The benefit of the program or project meet all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

16.0 %Executive summary addresses the cost or budget justification

The cost or budget justification is not provided.

The cost or budget justification is incomplete, missing relevant information.

The cost or budget justification is provided and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.

The cost or budget justification issue meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.

The cost or budget justification issue meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated by the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

16.0 %Executive summary addresses the basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated

The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated is not provided.

The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated is incomplete, missing relevant information.

The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions

The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated is provided in detail.

The basis, upon which the program or project will be evaluated as indicated by the assignment instructions, is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness



5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness



5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness



5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format



2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Format



3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage 

CONTENT:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Author: Institution: Date of Submission: The ability to sustain a continuous monitoring and assessment practice on a patient’s neural-function condition has become a critical milestone in the realms of critical care. The current practice of over-relying on the physician’s ability to analyze subjective cues related to drug sedation demonstrates a fundamental absence of standardization and has often precipitated in major inconsistencies in health care delivery. The introduction of controlled optimization of sedation has the potential to protect patients against diverse variations in blood pressure, agitation, ventilator asynchrony, as well as secondary organ injuries. In regard to this knowledge, the proposal is hereby made for the implementation of a BIS brain monitoring system at a cost of approximately $20,000. The purpose of the program or project Precise monitoring of the brain function has been demonstrated to offer additional insights that guide the assessment and

...

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout