This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Evaluation of how sugar influences ADHD in children. in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 79. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Evaluation of how sugar influences ADHD in children.
Please evaluate the presentation, and provide comments and additional information about the topic. In essence, you are adding to the literature review conducted by the team members of the project.
Specifically,you should be looking for an additional article relevant to the topic and discussing its relevance to the topic. You may also include personal stories, discuss the impact of the issue on society, and what was interesting about the topic.
Be sure to reference at least one peer reviewed source that can be used by the project you are responding to.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of sugar on the behavior or cognition of children by using meta-analytic techniques on reported studies. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified through a literature search of the MEDLINE and PsychINFO databases and the authors` files using sugar, sucrose, and attention deficit disorder as the search terms. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were required to (1) intervene by having the subjects consume a known quantity of sugar, (2) use a placebo (artificial sweetener) condition (3) blind the subjects, parents, and research staff to the conditions; and (4) report statistics that could be used to compute the dependent measures effect sizes. DATA EXTRACTION: Variables included publication year, study setting, subject type and number, gender, age, sugar and placebo type and dose, prior dietary condition, measurement construct, means and SDs for the sugar and placebo conditions, and direction of effect. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixteen reports met the inclusion criteria for a total of 23 within-subject design studies. The weighted mean effect size and related statistics for each of the 14 measurement constructs revealed that although the range for these means was from -0.14 for direct observations and up to +0.30 for academic tests, the 95% confidence interval for all 14 mean effect sizes included 0.
"Use Team C-3-1.ppt (attached) to evaluate and provide additional comments and information about the topic.