Jul 12, 2017 Others

Do you agree with Taylor? Why/why not? What are the implications to granting this presumption? How does Taylor engage with thinkers we have discussed in the text?

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Do you agree with Taylor? Why/why not? What are the implications to granting this presumption? How does Taylor engage with thinkers we have discussed in the text? in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Charles Taylor

INSTRUCTIONS:

Double spaced, 1" margins, 12 point type, and a normal font. Primarily your reaction to the to prompt, but must include support. Direct quotes, with proper citations and underline the thesis statement. Examine and engage Charles Taylor`s conclusion in "The Politics of Recognition" (section V). Your essay must cite section V, at least another section of "The Politics of Recognition", and at least two different chapters from the textbook. Consider the following questions, Do you agree with Taylor? Why/why not? What are the implications to granting this presumption? How does Taylor engage with thinkers we have discussed in the text? 



LINK TO SECTIONS OF THE TEXTBOOK: https://books.google.com/books/about/Introduction_to_Political_Theory.html?id=fHfABgAAQBAJ



LINK TO TAYLOR: http://elplandehiram.org/documentos/JoustingNYC/Politics_of_Recognition.pdf

CONTENT:

Topic: Student’s Name: Name of Institution: Due Date: Charles Taylor Taylor in his work “the politics of recognition” tried to offer an extensive philosophical justification for why groups in the western societies were demanding for public acknowledgement of their specific identities based on ethnicity, race, and gender. Taylor tried to explore the idea that to affirm equal dignity of groups, they must acknowledge their cultures. He justified that identities of individuals are dialogically and socially constructed. This explains the reason recognition is vital because it indicates how identity and its politics are significant for controlling and minimizing cases of group conflicts. This paper explains that Taylor’s claim is right when he justifies that while people should give acknowledgment and respect to what are universal human characteristics; everyone has own unique identity, which should be recognized and respected. However, this paper argues that Taylor erred by encouraging minority groups to abandon their particularity to comply with expectations and principles of dominant culture. Human identity is formed by the membership of a particular cultural group, and the sense of individual‘s self-worth is connected with the view that individuals are linked to their cultural groups (Hoffman and Graham 17). In this way, Taylor gives

...

0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout