Jan 24, 2018 sample paper 2

Describe your proposed computerization project.

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Describe your proposed computerization project. in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 45. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Ashford INF 620 Week 5 Assignment

Computerization

In a four- to five-page paper (not including the title page or reference page) analyze a business task that you would like to computerize. Consider how you could use the steps of the information systems development lifecycle as illustrated in Figure 12.3 (p. 486) to help you analyze a business task. To complete this assignment, you must:

  1. Describe your proposed computerization project.
  2. Create a schematic similar to Figure 12.3 that includes the specific information as it relates to your business task computerization project. Be sure to address the systems development lifecycle.
  3. Describe the operational feasibility, technical feasibility, and legal and political feasibility of the proposed computerization task. Use Figure 12.4 and Figure 12.6 for guidance. You may prepare a table along with your description, but it is not required.
  4. Formulate a list of both tangible and intangible benefits that support your proposed computerization project. Use Figure 12.5 for guidance. Provide a justification for your choices.

Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center, and it must include citations and references for the text and at least two scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library.

Carefully review the .waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4437/preview”>Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Reference:

O’Brien, J.A. & Marakas, G.M. (2011). Management Information Systems (10th ed.). New

York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. ISBN: 978-0-07-337681-3.

.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4437/preview”>Grading Rubric

Total Possible Score: 8.00

Analyzes the Business Task and Describes the Proposed Computerization Project

Total: 1.50

Distinguished – Thoroughly analyzes the business task and comprehensively describes the proposed computerization project. Effectively utilizes vocabulary and course concepts from the text and/or additional scholarly sources.

Proficient – Analyzes the business task and describes the proposed computerization project. Utilizes vocabulary and course concepts from the text and/or additional scholarly sources, but the analysis or description is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Partially analyzes the business task and somewhat describes the proposed computerization project. Somewhat utilizes vocabulary and course concepts from the text and/or additional scholarly sources and the analysis and/or description are underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the business task and describe the proposed computerization project; however, may not utilize vocabulary and course concepts from the text and/or additional scholarly sources, and the analysis and description are significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The analysis of the business task and description of the proposed computerization project are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Creates a Schematic Similar to Figure 12.3 That Includes Specific Information Relating to the Business Task Computerization Project

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Creates a schematic similar to Figure 12.3 that includes specific information relating to the business task computerization project and accurately addresses the systems development lifecycle.

Proficient – Creates a schematic that is mostly similar to Figure 12.3 that includes specific information relating to the business task computerization project and addresses the systems development lifecycle. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Creates a schematic that is somewhat similar to Figure 12.3 that includes specific information relating to the business task computerization project and somewhat addresses the systems development lifecycle. Relevant details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to create a schematic that is similar to Figure 12.3 that includes specific information relating to the business task computerization project; however, may not address the systems development lifecycle, and significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – The schematic similar to Figure 12.3 is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Describes the Operational Feasibility, Technical Feasibility, and Legal and Political Feasibility of the Proposed Computerization Task

Total: 1.50

Distinguished – Fully describes, the operational feasibility, technical feasibility, and legal and political feasibility of the proposed computerization project. Effectively applies course concepts and vocabulary to support the description.

Proficient – Describes the operational feasibility, technical feasibility, and legal and political feasibility of the proposed computerization project. Applies course concepts and vocabulary to support the description, but the description is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Briefly describes the operational feasibility, technical feasibility, and legal and political feasibility of the proposed computerization project. Somewhat applies course concepts and vocabulary to support the description, and the description is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe the operational feasibility, technical feasibility, and legal and political feasibility of the proposed computerization project; however, may not apply course concepts and vocabulary to support the description and the description is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The description of the operational feasibility, technical feasibility, political and legal feasibility of the proposed computerization project is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Formulates a List of Both Tangible and Intangible Benefits That Support the Proposed Computerization Project and Provides a Justification for the Choices

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Formulates a comprehensive list of both tangible and intangible benefits that support the proposed computerization project and provides an effective and well-supported justification for the choices.

Proficient – Formulates a list of both tangible and intangible benefits that support the proposed computerization project and provides a justification for the choices. The justification is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Formulates a partial list of both tangible and intangible benefits that support the proposed computerization project and provides a limited justification for the choices. The justification is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Formulates a list of both tangible and intangible benefits that support the proposed computerization project and attempts to justify the choices; however, the justification is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The list of tangible and intangible benefits that support the proposed computerization project and justification for the choices are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 0.60

Distinguished – Employs persuasive information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Below Expectations – Displays information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Creative Thinking: Solving Problems

Total: 0.60

Distinguished – Develops a logical, consistent plan to solve a problem, identifies consequences of the solution, and can clearly communicate the reason for choosing the solution.

Proficient – Carefully chooses among alternatives, and develops a logical, consistent approach to problem solving.

Basic – Takes into account and eliminates less acceptable approaches to problem solving.

Below Expectations – Takes into account a single approach and uses the approach to problem solving.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

corona virus stop
FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout