Aug 07, 2017

Defendant Legal Reasoning Brief/Opinion

This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Defendant Legal Reasoning Brief/Opinion in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Defendant Legal Reasoning Brief/Opinion

Please take a look at the attachment documents and read it very carefully as well as follow the guidelines and instructions thoroughly and carefully. I will check in every few days to see your progress. this is a revision of the paper attached: so far looks good. There is not enough court cases to support the claims of the defending attorney who is defending the defendant, please add more court cases to support that. Thank you. Writer, As stated in the instruction attached document, legal reasoning in support for the defendant needs court cases - I would prefer at least 10-12 court cases to support this paper. This paper also needs to be more well-written and more organized.
Defendant Legal Reasoning Brief/OpinionNameInstitutional affiliation: Defendant Legal Reasoning Brief/OpinionIntroductionThe court largely considered the objections that was raised by the petitioner, and decided that justice had to be embraced strongly by not allowing race to be a factor to consider in admitting students at universities and schools of graduate. The court ruled out that there must be a limitation on considering race in admission. However, history indicates that any program of admission in universities take in to account some factors that are pre-dominant to qualify an applicant`s eligibility for enrollment into a program, so long as the program meets the judiciary`s strict test of scrutiny (Jentz, 2008). Such pre-dominant factors include race. The University of Texas (UT) at Austin made the issue of race to be an individual consideration for those applicants who are not admitted to those states that are satisfied according to the law (Cramton & Carrington 2006).Thesis Statement: Is there a clearly articulated statement of the issues and the final decision? (These may be in separate sections, but for each issue there must be one). 20 ptsStatements of the issue include:UT and its missionUT was formed in 1883 with a primary mission of creating a first class university. For over 130 years, it has been considered Texas public university. The University has had a noble kind of history, and for over 70 years of UT existence, it has been segregated on race by the law. The university did not admit African Americans, until in 1950, after the court`s decision that Heman Sweatt must be included in law school of UT despite of his race (Porter, 2004).Effort to promote diversity at UTIn efforts to appreciate the influential benefits of a body of diverse students in relation to higher education, both the state of Texas and UT have implemented critical procedures to help in promoting diversity at the university. Such procedures include:UT used race and academic index to select students before 1996. The academic index was based on the ranks of the class of student`s secondary school, curriculum of the applicant`s secondary school and test scores that are standardized. Race was the major factor for an applicant before the admission committee could review nonminority and minority applicants, for admission.The Hopwood v. Texas (1996) case: The case involved a white applicant Cheryl Hopwood whose admission was denied in favor of the minorities even though she had better grades than them. She sued Texas Law School which aimed to increase the enrollment of the minority students to the detriment of whites. The U.S. Court of Appeals held that the 14th Amendment does not permit this kind of discrimination. The court however concluded that the law school may or may not use race as a factor in admission. The reasoning was that since the society was racially divided, it is right that a past injustice against blacks be compensated by favoring them against the ...

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions

International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120

100% Pass Guarantee

Order Now


We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

FLAT 25% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT25" as your promo code during checkout