This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers’ budgeting behaviours, Accounting, Organizations and Society in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers’ budgeting behaviors, Accounting, Organizations and Society
Instructions for the layout of the paper:
APA style to be used.
Analysis of the strong points of the paper written by David Marginson, Stuart Ogden (2005): Coping with ambiguity through the budget: the positive effects of budgetary targets on managers’ budgeting behaviours, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30, pp.435-456
- Identify important strong points in the paper
- Include papers(literature) that may support your criticism
- Your argumentation needs to be strengthened with the findings or arguments from this literature
- Some new relevant literature that is about the topic addressed in the paper of Marginson &Ogden
- What does this new (recent) literature say about this topic?
I will upload some papers about management control that will help with the argumentation for the strong points, however I don’t have articles for Part 2.
The paper should also have reference list.
The structure should be something along the lines of:
-This is a strong point from the article:”The authors Marginson & Ogden argue that…”
-This is the argument from relevant literature that supports the strong point:” Their argumentation is also sustained by findings from author().. that states that..”
-Please be very clear about the strong points and argumentation
With regards to the slides 3 of them should present the strong points of the topic and as a foot note some arguments the relevant literature and the other 3 slides should be about the new literature with argumentation as well.
Criteria for evaluation:
The quality of the critical analysis including the use of the relevant literature( strength of argumentation, use of the literature, relevance of criticism, clearness)