This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Case laws for business study in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 79. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Case laws for business study
Read the call-of-the-question carefully, and follow the instructions for each subject. Prepare four briefing papers using the APA format for research papers, and upload them as one document for your response.
Briefing Paper 1: Critical Legal Thinking
Instructions:
•Read Intel Corporation v. Intelsys Software, LLC -- Cheeseman text page 170-171.
•Respond to the three Case Questions found in Cheeseman text page 171.
•Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions whether the federal government has a right to interfere with your business, and if so, under what conditions..
Briefing Paper 2: Law Case with Answers
Instructions:
•Read Arizona v. Gant - Cheeseman text page 146-147.
•Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in the Critical Legal Thinking, Ethics, and Contemporary Business - argue both sides of all three issues..
Briefing Paper 3: Critical Legal Thinking Cases
Instructions:
•Read sections 5.7 Equal Protection Clause (p. 106); 6.8 Design Defect (p. 128-129); 7.8 Search and Seizure (p. 153); and 8.1 Fair Use (p. 176).
•Check the decisions of the highest appellate courts for each fact pattern..
•Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether each of the four subjects affect business in the United States and if so, provide the worst and best case scenarios..
Briefing Paper 4: Ethics Case
Instructions:
•Read Section 8.10 Ethics - Cheeseman text page 178 Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the 3 questions found at the end of Section. Argue both sides of all issues..