This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Applying ethics in information technology:does the writer fail to see that the same technology has also brought some positive issues in our society? in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
I find the article Applying ethics in information technology totally absurd and off the topic. To some extent am tempted to ask why the writer was too vague in looking at all prongs. If asked, I would say the writer was only making facts that are only favourable to him rather than the view of the society. Sure it is a good excerpt, but then there is a lot more that Mason could have said to sound like an authority. His outline makes a comment that technology is a major co-conspirator in ethics since it is capable of augmenting mental and physical powers. I totally disagree with this view that technology is the reason behind loss of ethics if anything technology has solved ills too.
Tavani (30) comments even the rules of the jungle always focus on the survival for the fittest. It is only the best adapted that can survive. Mason states that were it not for technology some of the ethical problems that people go through in the world today they would not undergo. I tend to wonder, does the writer fail to see that the same technology has also brought some positive issues in our society? Things are so much easier today as opposed to how they were a few years ago. Were it not for technology, how would we live this world at this day? Ethics has always been an issue since the beginning of the world. The only issue that probably makes technology appear as a problem to ethics is that it has made it possible for individuals to realise that other individuals from different have completely different ways of interpreting and doing things.
An ethical issue arises whenever one individual pursues those goals that may affect ability of another party to pursue their goals (Mason 56). If these were to be the case, how would people accommodate one another with so many differences in our societal orientation, different interests and goals that direct what we intend to pursue. Technology after all cannot be the main problem that affects goals. How we chose to pursue those goals is a mere choice. If indeed an individual chooses to focus on other issues despite the issue of ethics arising, there are many more issues that will come such as human being selfish and wanting only them to achieve their goals ahead of other people whether they are their friends or their enemies.
Mason gives an example on how the use of mails makes it hard as other problems such as privacy arise. He further adds that individuals such as programmers, designers, system analysts have the moral obligation to ensure their actions do not interfere with those of others. His view holds true but also arouses other thoughts how can individuals know they made the right decisions (Dror and David 600). If they made an action and they forgot what they might have learnt would that still fall as a factor in deciding whether it is ethical or not? Would a moment of truth hold true if such an action leads to loss of billions of a company while saving the lives of an individual? Using moral imagination is a good, but it also opens up new thoughts. Moral imagination is all about how we have been cultured and been brought up. Thus, even if it we are to use our imagination, an issue of ethics would still arise. We thus cannot make any blame on technology rather we could probably do so to our individual personalities.
The article also gives a thought on how a moral agent can make a morally induced change through technology. That by itself begs several question, already we have established that technology by itself only makes us see how wider the gap between us and other societies is. How then would we then choose an action that befits all these people? This is not possible at all, and we cannot choose technology to be the scapegoat. The second factor that falls on determining the morally relevant fact is the determination of all the alternative courses of actions. Still, this is a possibility that other humans are not able to achieve. There are so many ways individuals could make a decision on the right or wrong.