2019-02-14T07:20:12+00:00
Quality Improvement & Stakeholders Report: Quality of Care in the Maternal and Newborn Department
This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Quality Improvement & Stakeholders Report: Quality of Care in the Maternal and Newborn Department in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Quality Improvement & Stakeholders Report: Quality of Care in the Maternal and Newborn Department Instructions:
Quality Improvement & Stakeholders Report (100pts) This assignment requires a full 3-4 page research report reflecting critical thinking and an analysis of the research findings. Reports must be supported with 3 scholarly creditable outside resources and is to be formatted throughout in accord with APA requirements. In summary required is the Title Page, the Main Body, and a Citations page. Papers are to be posted in the Assignment folder titled QI & Stakeholders for grading by Saturday 11:59 PM. Be sure to reference the competency/student learning outcomes identified in the weekly overview and in the rubric as grading is strictly adhered to the identified competencies. Topic: Share a quality improvement activity that has been implemented in your healthcare setting and describe how the process to gain information, analyze, implement strategies to correct and evaluate the situation were addressed. Include the following in your paper: Identify the quality management assessment model used How the problem was identified and by who How the data was collected & analyzed Was any type of software program used What actions were taken to improve the situation How was the implementation of the corrective actions evaluated Is there ongoing quality assessment Include who the stakeholders are and what they expect from quality Rubric Week 2 Insight Paper Rubric (1) Week 2 Insight Paper Rubric (1) Criteria Ratings Pts Competency/Outcome • Apply one quality improvement model used to achieve quality and safety improvements Exemplary- Demonstrates an advanced understanding of the primary thesis of the paper that sparks the interest of the reader and clearly identifies competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 25 pts Mastery- Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the primary thesis of the paper that sparks the interest of the reader and identifies competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 22.5 pts Proficient- Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the primary thesis of the paper however competencies/ outcomes to be achieved are not clearly defined 20 pts Emerging- Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the primary thesis of the paper and does not identify the competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 17.5 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- The paper does not reflect an understanding of the primary thesis of the paper and does not identify the competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 0 pts 25 pts Critical Thinking/ Analytical Skills Exemplary- Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified; consistently demonstrates the use of critical thinking/ analytical skills 25 pts Mastery- Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified; demonstrates the use of critical thinking/ analytical skills 22.5 pts Proficient- Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified; minimal demonstration of the use of critical thinking/ analytical skills 20 pts Emerging- Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified; demonstrates little or no use of critical thinking/analysis skill 17.5 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- Does not present any critical thinking/ analysis 0 pts 25 pts Utilization of Research Exemplary- Supplements paper with relevant and extensive research into the body of the paper 25 pts Mastery- Supplements paper with relevant research into the body of the paper 22.5 pts Proficient- Supplements paper with limited research into the body of the paper 20 pts Emerging- Minimally supplements paper with research into the body of the paper 17.5 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- Does not include relevant research into the body of the paper 0 pts 25 pts Quality and Organization of the writing Exemplary- The paper is extremely well organized, makes excellent transitions from point to point, no spelling or grammatical errors and all references correctly cited 25 pts Mastery- The paper is generally well organized with relatively smooth transitions from point to point; rare number of spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not correctly cited 22.5 pts Proficient- The paper is organized with somewhat smooth transitions from point to point; under3 spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not correctly cited 20 pts Emerging- The paper is minimally well organized with minimally acceptable transitions from point to point; several spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not correctly cited 17.5 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- The paper is poorly organized with clumsy transitions from point to point, several spelling and grammatical errors, and references not correctly cited 0 pts 25 pts Total Points: 100 By Instructure User Research Privacy policy Term
Content:
Quality Improvement & Stakeholders Report Name: Institutional Affiliation: Professor: Course; Date Introduction The healthcare industry is today viewed as one of the fastest growing industries in the world. This depicts the fact that this industry remains an integral part of each and every society and thus consists of different organizations, actions, and people whose main motive remains in promoting, maintaining and restoring health. However, it is essential to note that there are cases where evidence of poor quality among hospitals has been noted (Westby, Klemm, Li, & Jones, 2016). This has seen the federal governments and different foundations include the private sector fund research approaches aimed at identifying appropriate clinical practices that would improve the quality of healthcare within medical institutions and reduce the errors that affect health outcomes. This paper therefore seeks to share a quality improvement activity implemented within a health institution and the processes involved in achieving this. Qual
...
Get Fresh Answer: £40 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions