Prince by Machiavelli Nicoolo Mahiavillie
This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Prince by Machiavelli Nicoolo Mahiavillie in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Prince by Machiavelli Nicoolo Mahiavillie INSTRUCTIONS:
Essay based on the Prince by Machiavelli 1200 to 1250 words only, 3 footnote citations and a “quote or 2” in each paper Consider Chapter 5, the first chapter of the work in which he makes republics his subject to answer the following To what extent does the chapter vindicate and tarnish Machiavelli`s reputation as a republican, also use the following chapters to strengthening your argument 6,7,8,12,15,16,17 and also from chapter 5,6,7 help clarify the contradiction of Machiavelli`s treatment of republics and highlight at what do republics outshine, according to Chapter 5 and at what did the armed prophets of Chapter 6 excel, write a clear interpretation of Machiavelli`s position on republics, one firmly grounded in the text. Write you thesis based on the first question of the essay vindicate Machiavelli`s reputation as a republican, and to what extent does it tarnish it and use the other question to strengthening your answers I have written this essay already and I would like to see what are you going to write so I can compare it to my writings and see the final end of the Constance you are going to come up with so please do your best. use the Book THE PRINCE as the source. CHeck out the website http://www.emachiavelli.com/Prince%20outline_copy%281%29.htm for more knowledge but the citation from the book only.
CONTENT:
Prince by Machiavelli[Name][Institution][Date]Prince by MachiavelliNiccolo Machiavelli wrote the famous book “The Prince†in 1532. In this piece of work, describes how a leader can gain power and maintain it. Throughout the book, he gives various qualities of a responsible leader, while citing some examples of leaders who exemplified such qualities. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the content of this book “The Princeâ€, in order to reveal how the book vindicates, and at the same time tarnishes Machiavelli`s name as a leader who has a republican reputation.[Italian political leader. He was born in the year 1469 and died in 1527] According to Machiavelli, “Whenever those states, which have been acquired as stated, have been accustomed to live under their own laws and freedom, there are three courses for those who wish to hold them. The first is to ruin them, the next is to reside there in person, the third is to permit them to live under their own laws, drawing tribute, and establishing within it an oligarchy which will keep it friendly to youâ€. Arguing with reference to republicans, the way Machiavelli has described the actions a prince can take justifies his reputation as a republican. For instance, President Bush who was a republican, acted in the same way as a prince would act towards a province that has unlawful acts. As per Machiavelli`s argument of a good leader, President Bush had no blame for allowing his armies to attack Iraq. This is because the operation was geared at demolishing weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.[NiccoloÌ€ and Marriott, The prince, chapter 5] On the other hand, Machiavelli`s argument of what a prince can do tarnishes his reputation as a republican. A good leader does not deprive his people the will to chose whom they want to be their leader. Therefore, by arguing that a prince can decide to move his government to the conquered land, and live there in order to ensure full authority over the region, tarnishes his reputation as a republican as this will deny the inhabitants of the conquered land the opportunity to elect leaders of their choice.Machiavelli continues to expound on how a leader can maintain his power by citing the example that if a leader becomes a master of a city accustomed to liberty, and fails to destroy it, he must be prep...
Get Fresh Answer: £40 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,