1 1/2 pages: Write an organized response to Willerton`s "Writing Toward Reader`s Better Health." (in attachments). In your response, state the reading, the author(s)` argument, and the main points. Discuss what lessons you draw from the reading, why you think it is important and how it relates the subject matter of the course or other course concepts.



Your assertions about the reading should be properly supported by evidence from the reading. For example, if you think the argument is x, then explain what brought you to that conclusion. If I can see why you think something (i.e., if you provide me evidence of your thought process), I can give you credit even if you are incorrect about the reading. Your critical thinking is what is important, but I can only see it if you support your points.



Your response should be one-half to one page in length. Do not exceed two pages. You may have more to say so use the space wisely when you organize your response. One of the skills we are working on here (in addition to critical thinking) is writing concisely and effectively organizing your writing. 



1 page: Drawing from the article used in the first assignment (above) what kinds of usability questions might need to be asked and researched in the environment described in the Willerton article? 



1 page: In your own words, describe the difference between big and little usability and the various tools available for each.



1 page( or a little less): In your own words, describe personas and scenarios and their purpose in usability research