Write an organized response to Garner et al.`s "Common Use of PowerPoint versus the Assertion-Evidence Structure." In your response, state the reading, the author(s)` argument, and the main points. Discuss what lessons you draw from the reading, why you think it is important and how it relates the subject matter of the course or other course concepts.



Your assertions about the reading should be properly supported by evidence from the reading. For example, if you think the argument is x, then explain what brought you to that conclusion. If I can see why you think something (i.e., if you provide me evidence of your thought process), even if you are incorrect about the reading, the critical thinking is what is important, but I can only see it if you support your points.





Only use quotations from the reading when absolutely necessary to support your claims. Refrain from excessive quotations. Summarize the material in your own words.



Be sure to review the rubric.



Rubric:

Content: I am assessing your critical thinking skills, your ability to recognize and explain an argument and main points in relation to the readings, and your ability to connect the readings to larger contexts (e.g., your own work or career goals or social issues). Responses should demonstrate a critical engagement with the reading by grappling with the ideas and concepts. Your responses should be in your own words and not rely heavily on quotations. If quotations are absolutely necessary, they must be explicated and explained.



Your assertions about the reading should be properly supported by evidence from the reading. For example, if you think the argument is x, then explain what in the reading brought you to that conclusion.



Organization: Responses should have a clear and logical hierarchy of information or presentation of ideas.



Style and Diction: Responses should follow a clear and concise style. Appropriate diction.



Grammar and mechanics: Responses should be free of punctuation, grammatical, and spelling errors.