Instructions:
Theory of Knowledge Essay Plan
Introduction (200 words)
Paragraph 1
Clearly state your knowledge question (same as your title).
State which area of knowledge you are dealing with.
Briefly state your thesis. What is your answer to the knowledge question?
Write a sentence or two stating the order in which you will deal with your points.
Say which ways of knowing and areas of knowledge you’re going to use.
Body.
Claim - (250 words).
Paragraph 2.
Ways of knowing and the knowledge framework should feature in this paragraph.
Write a topic sentence stating why you support the knowledge question.
Give details of why you support the knowledge question.
Provide a real life example to clarify and support the claim from your own experience. Examples should be personal, specific, precise and real.
Body.
Counter-claim - (250 words).
Paragraph 3.
Ways of knowing and the knowledge framework should feature in this paragraph.
Write a topic sentence stating why you do not support the knowledge question.
Give details of why you do not support the knowledge question.
Provide a real life example to clarify and support the claim from your own experience. You can use the same example from the previous paragraph, or you can choose a different one.
Body.
Evaluation: Part one - (250-300 words).
Paragraph 4.
Ways of knowing and the knowledge framework should feature in this paragraph.
Say which you support more – the claim or the counter-claim.
Don’t simply state your opinion. Connect your thinking to one or more of the following theories or arguments: moral relativism, self-interest, evolutionary, hidden benefits, fear of punishment, religious, duty, Kantian, Utilitarianism.
Body.
Evaluation: Part two - (200 words).
Paragraph 5.Why is it important that we know about these issues?
Explain another perspective that someone may have (e.g. an older person).
Content:
Theory of Knowledge Essay Name: Institutional Affiliation: Professor: Course: Date Introduction In terms of knowledge, it can be determined that its acquisition may take different approaches which determine whether individuals have the capacity to know something or not. As determined, it is essential to consider that all knowledge may not be equally valuable with the basic element that supports our knowledge remaining at how well this can be justified (Van de Lagemaat, Richard, 2005). In knowledge gaining and acquisition, justification is likely to take into consideration different areas of knowledge, a factor that proves the different approaches of acquiring knowledge. In this case, the knowledge that is valued may tentatively vary in accordance to the areas of knowledge. It is essential to consider the fact that knowledge remains one of the vital elements that is used to explain the world that surrounds us with the aim of furthering our understanding in the making of decisions. This paper in this case attempts to articulate the aspect of knowledge gaining that uses a network of approaches in knowing. In giving a clear indication of this studies question, the study will make reference of the two areas of knowing referred to as natural sciences. Gaining Knowledge, Through The Use of a Network of Ways of Knowing One of
...