This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Find a journal or a conference proceeding article on the topics of Module 3 and complete a paper critique following the instructions posted in the syllabus. in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Paper Critique
please read carefully:
Find a journal or a conference proceeding article on the topics of Module 3 and complete a paper critique following the instructions posted in the syllabus.
Module 3 have two topic:
Topic 1 – Emerging issues in Security Technologies for Mobile Computing.
or
Topic 2 – Emerging issues in Security Technologies for Cloud Computing.
Paper Critique: complete a paper critique. Follow the instructions below.
Make sure you read the required readings; and make you think about the material and follow the following guideline while preparing the one page critique:
1. Please keep reading critique short (1 page or less)
2. Summarize the paper in 2-3 sentences [20 points]
_______________________________
(((((((3. Identify the three points you think are the most important and valid in the paper (say why) [20 points for each POINT: 10 points for identifying a point and 10 points for explaining why; hence total of 60 points]))))))))
last time my prof take off some point because you didn’t do that point well. please make sure you ((( Identify the three points you think are the most important and valid in the paper))) (((((say why)))))
__________________________________
DO NOT PARAPHRASE THE PAPER, have a critical, independent view. Example:
• “Property A that the paper describes is important, because another study (Y)
has shown that systems satisfying A are more resilient to spoofing” (Good!)
• “Property B is important for securing the system” (WHY???)
• “The paper is well written which makes it easy to read for me” (WEAK –
argue on the contents, not the form)
((((((((4. Identify one point that you either disagree with (say why), or that you would like to have seen addressed in the paper (say why) [20 points: 10 points for a POINT and 10 points for explaining