2019-02-14T07:20:12+00:00
Explain the value of tools and measurements and their impact on quality, cost and safety
This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Explain the value of tools and measurements and their impact on quality, cost and safety in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Methods of Measurement used to Evaluate Quality Improvement Outcomes Instructions:
Insight Paper: Methods of Measuring Quality (100 pts.) This assignment requires a full 3-4 page research report reflecting critical thinking and an analysis of the research findings. Reports must be supported with 3 scholarly creditable outside resources and is to be formatted throughout in accord with APA requirements. In summary required is the Title Page, the Main Body, and a Citations page. Papers are to be posted by Saturday 11:59 pm. in the assignment folder titled Methods of Measuring Quality. Be sure to reference the competency/student learning outcomes identified in the weekly overview and in the rubric as grading is strictly adhered to the identified competencies. Topic: Research methods of measurement used to evaluate quality improvement outcomes. Identify and clearly define 2 methods including the environment and conditions most appropriate for their application . You may choose one that you might have used in your work setting to measure a change to improve outcomes with cost, quality or safety. (Example of Measures: Outcome, Process, Structural). Rubric Week 5 Insight Paper Rubric Week 5 Insight Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Competency/Outcome• Differentiate between data collection tools and types of measures utilized in the quality improvement process • Explain the value of tools and measurements and their impact on quality, cost and safety Exemplary- Demonstrates an advanced understanding of the primary thesis of the paper that sparks the interest of the reader and clearly identifies competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 25 pts Mastery- Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the primary thesis of the paper that sparks the interest of the reader and identifies competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 22.5 pts Proficient- Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the primary thesis of the paper however competencies/ outcomes to be achieved are not clearly defined 20 pts Emerging- Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the primary thesis of the paper and does not identify the competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 17.5 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- The paper does not reflect an understanding of the primary thesis of the paper and does not identify the competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 0 pts 25 pts Critical Thinking/ Analytical Skills Exemplary- Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified; consistently demonstrates the use of critical thinking/ analytical skills 25 pts Mastery- Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified; demonstrates the use of critical thinking/ analytical skills 22.5 pts Proficient- Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified; minimal demonstration of the use of critical thinking/ analytical skills 20 pts Emerging- Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified; demonstrates little or no use of critical thinking/analysis skill 17.5 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- Does not present any critical thinking/ analysis 0 pts 25 pts Utilization of Research Exemplary- Supplements paper with relevant and extensive research into the body of the paper 25 pts Mastery- Supplements paper with relevant research into the body of the paper 22.5 pts Proficient- Supplements paper with limited research into the body of the paper 20 pts Emerging- Minimally supplements paper with research into the body of the paper 17.5 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- Does not include relevant research into the body of the paper 0 pts 25 pts Quality and Organization of the writing Exemplary- The paper is extremely well organized, makes excellent transitions from point to point, no spelling or grammatical errors and all references correctly cited 25 pts Mastery- The paper is generally well organized with relatively smooth transitions from point to point; rare number of spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not correctly cited 22.5 pts Proficient- The paper is organized with somewhat smooth transitions from point to point; under3 spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not correctly cited 20 pts Emerging- The paper is minimally well organized with minimally acceptable transitions from point to point; several spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not correctly cited 17.5 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- The paper is poorly organized with clumsy transitions from point to point, several spelling and grammatical errors, and references not correctly cited 0 pts 25 pts Total Points: 100 By Instructure
Content:
Methods of Measuring Quality Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Methods of Measuring Quality Health Care quality has been defined by Institute of Medicine as “the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge,†(IOM, 2001). The main objective of healthcare systems is to provide quality health services that will optimize the health of the people thus the efforts of improving the quality of health services are the key to achieving this objective. Although many people has the assumption that the quality of health care provided in their countries especially in developed nations is high, it has been noted that it is often not the case. The IOM has identified six components of health care systems that ensure that high qualit
...
Get Fresh Answer: £40 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions