Discuss the Meaning of "Interrogation" and What the Law Allows and What it Doesn`t
This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Discuss the Meaning of "Interrogation" and What the Law Allows and What it Doesn`t in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Discuss the Meaning of "Interrogation" and What the Law Allows and What it Doesn`t Instructions:
The first 3 pages discuss the meaning of "Interrogation " and what the law allows and what it doesn`t allow.
Content:
Interrogation Name: Institute: Interrogation is a form of questioning by law enforcement officers, the subject directed to this questioning must be in custody (Bloom and Brodin 2004). The authors referred the case of Rhodes Island v Innis (2001) which expanded the meaning of interrogation to include any words or actions on the part of the police that the police believe would lead to an incriminating response from a suspect. The court in Innis found that where a police engaged in a formal conversation about a murder weapon with a suspect it did not amount to an interrogation. Bloom and Brodin (2000) gives another meaning stating that, interrogation involves conduct with intention to get a confession, it also involves such actions that are foreseeable by the police officers to elicit a confession. Interrogation is the direct questioning of a suspect to gather evidence of criminal activity and try to get a confession (Gaines and Miller 2005). Arizona v Mauro (1987) the court focused on both the perception of the suspect and the con
...
Get Fresh Answer: £40 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,