Jul 12, 2017
Differentiate between structural and voluntarist theories of democratization (i.e., what makes a structural theory different from a voluntarist theory?)
This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Differentiate between structural and voluntarist theories of democratization (i.e., what makes a structural theory different from a voluntarist theory?) in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Political Science Essay INSTRUCTIONS:
Should politicians desiring democracy “follow the Western path” and “modernize, then democratize”? Why or Why not? Use material from the unit on democratization and the experiences of South Africa and/or El Salvador to support your claims. Your response to this prompt should do the following: 1. Differentiate between structural and voluntarist theories of democratization (i.e., what makes a structural theory different from a voluntarist theory?) 2. BRIEFLY explain each structural and voluntarist explanation of democratization discussed in class (e.g., modernization, neo-modernization, Marxism, and voluntarism), showing familiarity with all relevant course readings. 3. Provide a well-organized argument explaining which factors best explain democratization (i.e., should states modernize then democratize? Or should they do something else?) 4. Use case material from either El Salvador or South Africa to substantiate your argument (i.e., what can states learn from El Salvador? South Africa?) You do not need to use outside resources for this paper. The paper should be 4-5 pages in length (typed, double-spaced, with one inch margins), and should contain a bibliography. You may use either MLA or APA format to cite sources within your paper. Please be aware that papers lacking an identifiable thesis and/or those showing a lack of familiarity with actual course readings will be severely penalized. Additionally, papers which do not address the question and/or do not meet length and margin guidelines may not receive credit for the assignment. NO PLAGRISM PLEASE Name of the book: forging democracy from below By: Elisabeth Jean Wood https://books.google.com/books/about/Forging_Democracy_from_Below.html?id=fkFFwF10agcC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false Online link for the book All information from the book please Pages from: 3-22 , 111-212 NO PLAGRISM PLEASE ALL INFORMATION FROM THE BOOK
CONTENT:
Political Science 101 Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Introduction This paper seeks to elaborate the path to democracy. The question whether politicians should modernize, then democratize will be answered in this paper. Arguments will be based on experiences from South Africa and El Salvador. Thesis: Politicians desiring democracy should use other methods to democratise, other than follow the Western path of “modernize then democratize” The transition from a semi-authoritarian or a fully authoritarian political system to a democratic political regime is known as democratization. Democratization is best explained in these two countries using two theories; structural and voluntarist theories. The structural approach to democratization largely involves modernization, industrialization and education in order to eliminate traditional aspects of society and replace them with hierarchies that separate themselves from other structures to form political structures. Voluntarist theories on the
...
Get Fresh Answer: £40 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions