This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 45. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Assignment 2: Diagnosing Change HRM 560

Assignment 2: Diagnosing Change

Due Week 4

Using BEST BUY or WALMART (which one you Choose) synthesize the organization’s readiness for change. Evaluate whether or not to implement your new program, policy, practice, or procedure. Alternatively, you may submit a four to six (4-6) page paper instead of the video submission.

Note:If you are using a tablet or smartphone, you will need to email the video file to yourself, then save it to a computer in order to upload to Blackboard. You may want to upload your video to a file sharing service, such as Dropbox, if your email will not let you send a large video file. Dropbox is accessible from all smartphones and tablets from the Dropbox app.

Once you are ready to upload your video to Blackboard, .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/STANDARDIZED/1146-PresentationAssignmentSubmission/PresentationAssignmentSubmission.html”>click here to view the “Student Video Assignment Submission” video tutorial in the “Creating a Presentation for Your Course” playlist.

Please use the following naming convention in the popup window for your video once it is finished uploading:

Title: Your First Name, Your Last Name – Managing Organizational Change

Tags: HRM560, Organizational Change

Description: First Name, Last Name – HRM560 Assignment 2 (Date Uploaded ex. 11-14-2014)

write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.
Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.
Formulate three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.
Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.
Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change.
1. Provide results of the diagnostic analysis
2. Explain the results
Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.

If you choose the written paper, your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Evaluate an organization’s readiness for change.
Analyze diagnostic models relevant to various aspects of the change management process.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in managing organizational change.
Write clearly and concisely about managing organizational change using proper writing mechanics.

Grading
for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of
the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 140	Assignment 2: Diagnosing Change
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1.Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely describedthe company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.	Partially describedthe company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.	Satisfactorily describedthe company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.	Thoroughly describedthe company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.
2.Analyze in detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely analyzedin detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.	Partially analyzedin detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.	Satisfactorily analyzedin detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.	Thoroughly analyzedin detail the current HR practice, policy, process, or procedure that you believe should be changed.
3.Formulate three (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely formulatedthree (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.	Partially formulatedthree (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.	Satisfactorily formulatedthree (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.	Thoroughly formulatedthree (3) valid reasons for the proposed change based on current change management theories.
4. Appraise the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Propose two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Defend why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Did not submit or incompletely defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.	Partially appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Partially proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Partially defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.	Satisfactorily appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Satisfactorily proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Satisfactorily defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.	Thoroughly appraised the diagnostic tools that you can use to determine an organization’s readiness for change. Thoroughly proposed two (2) diagnostic tools which you can utilize to determine if the organization is ready for change. Thoroughly defended why you believe the diagnostic tools selected are the best choice for diagnosing change in the organization.
5a.Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change. Provide results of the diagnostic analysis. Weight: 5%	Did not submit or incompletely assessedthe organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Did not submit or incompletely provided results of the diagnostic analysis.	Partially assessedthe organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Partially provided results of the diagnostic analysis.	Satisfactorily assessedthe organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Satisfactorily provided results of the diagnostic analysis.	Thoroughly assessedthe organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Thoroughly provided results of the diagnostic analysis.
5b.Using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected, assess the organization’s readiness for change. Explain the results. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely assessedthe organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Did not submit or incompletely explained the results.	Partially assessedthe organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Partially explained the results.	Satisfactorily assessedthe organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Satisfactorily explained the results.	Thoroughly assessedthe organization’s readiness for change, using one (1) of the diagnostic tools you selected. Thoroughly explained the results.
6.Interpret whether or not the organization is ready for change. Substantiate your conclusion by referencing current change management theories. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely interpretedwhether or not the organization is ready for change. Did not submit or incompletely substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.	Partially interpretedwhether or not the organization is ready for change. Partially substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.	Satisfactorily interpretedwhether or not the organization is ready for change.Satisfactorily substantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.	Thoroughly interpretedwhether or not the organization is ready for change.Thoroughlysubstantiated your conclusion by referencing current change management theories.
7. Clarity / Coherence in Presentation and writing mechanics Weight: 5%	More than 6 errors present. Information is confusing and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.	5-6 errors present. Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.	3-4 errors present. Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.	0-2 errors present. Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
8. Met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option. Weight: 5%	Did not submit or incompletely met formatting requirements, including one (1) page summary for presentation option.

Describe the company in terms of industry, size, number of employees, and history.

Assignment 2: Diagnosing Change HRM 560

100% Pass Guarantee

STILL NOT CONVINCED?