This paper concentrates on the primary theme of Correlation Analysis in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 79. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.

Biomechanics of ligament and relationship between age, diagnosis and histology.

The aims were to determine whether there is a link between histology. That is SMA, EVG and MT and the other parameters. And a link between the histological parameters in themselves.

Hypothesis: young`s modulus and/or yield and/or strain is related to age/diagnosis/histology

The samples are from ligaments removed from patients after surgery.

Patient number Age Diagnosis Duration of symptoms (months) EVG mt SMA strain Yield Youngs
1 28 Prolapse 6 0.7097 0.1178 82 63.32 1.51 0..067
2 48 Stenosis 84 0.6473 0.0978 26 177 4.55 0.051
3 80 Stenosis 144 0.6785 0.1301 19 105.01 1.4 0.021
4 68 Stenosis 36 0.6329 0.085 17
5 26 Prolapse 27
6 69 Stenosis 48 0.438 0.3909 9 205.29 6.41 0.058
7 36 Prolapse 42 0.6228 0.2268 71 161.67 1.68 0.0327
8 33 Prolapse 18 0.7498 0.1781 72 159.17 1.68 0.021
9 38 Stenosis 96 0.6397 0.2527 76
10 24 Prolapse 12 0.6999 0.134 63

1. is there a correlation between age and any of the other variables

2. is there a correlation between diagnosis and any of the other variables

3. is there a correlation between EVG,SMA or MT independent of other factors

4. Is there a correlation between the strain, yield or youngs and any of the MT, EVG and SMA

5. Is there a correlatin between youngs, yield and strain and age or diagnosis

6. Is there a correlation between duration of symptoms and SMA irrespective of other factors