ACC 304 Ethics Case Critical Thinking
This paper concentrates on the primary theme of ACC 304 Ethics Case Critical Thinking in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 40. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
ACC 304 Ethics Case Critical Thinking
Framework
– Due Tuesday, September 8, 2015 11:59 pm
John Parker is the controller for Old Town Plastics (OTP), a supplier to Pyrex. OTP encourages all employees to participate in community activities as part of a company public service program. John has volunteered at A Helping Hand for several years. A Helping Hand provides food, clothing, counseling and transportation services to anyone in need. The CEO of the organization asked John to prepare, for a fee, the organization’s Form 990 and annual financial statements. The Form 990 is an IRS filing requirement for tax-exempt organizations, which contains financial, governance and program information. John prepared these forms for other nonprofit organizations when he was in college 10 years ago.
Critical Thinking
Framework
Questions
1. Identify the Issue What potential ethical conflicts or ethical questions come to mind after reading this scenario? 2. Gather Data Identify the stakeholders in this situation. 3. Gather Data Which of the standards in the IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice apply to this situation? Briefly state why each standard applies. 4. Analyze the Issue Develop courses of action that John might consider. Analyze each alternative based on your general and accounting knowledge, the identified
stakeholders, the IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice, assumed organizational factors and the information provided.
5. Draw Conclusions Recommend one course of action to John and justify the recommendation
using appropriate supporting data.
Requirements:
1. Submit your answers in a Word document through Blackboard. Type the question number before each answer, but do not include the text of the questions with your answe Please write in complete sentences, but you may use lists or bullet formatting. Your complete write up should be no longer than three (3) pages. 2. Be concise but compl I recommend this process: 1) write your answers, 2) set aside, 3) review and correct, 4) remove unnecessary words (words that do not enhance understanding or clarity), 5) proofread, 6) submit before the deadline. 3. Late submissions will receive an automatic 5-point deduction.
Ethics Case Rubric
Requirement Unacceptable (60%) A c c ep table (80%) Exemplary (100%) Identify the Issues
(10 pts)
Presents questions or
issues not applicable to the situation or that do not present a potential ethical conflict
Presents potential ethical
conflict or question associated with the scenario
Clearly and concisely
presents potential ethical conflicts or questions associated with the scenario demonstrating understanding and thought
Identify
Stakeholders
(5 pts)
Identifies inappropriate stakeholders Identifies minimal number of appropriate
stakeholders
Identifies sufficient number of appropriate stakeholders Identify Ethical
Standards
(10 pts)
Does not identify an
applicable IMA ethical standard or does not provide appropriate explanation of standards included
Identifies applicable IMA
ethical standard with minimal explanation for inclusion
Identifies applicable IMA
ethical standards with appropriate explanation for inclusion demonstrating understanding and thought
Develop and
Analyze courses of action
(10 pts)
Does not develop courses
of action or does not clearly, analyze from multiple perspectives (including the IMA ethical standards) or does not provide assumptions made.
Develops distinct courses
of action with support from multiple sources (including the IMA ethical standards) and provides assumptions made.
Develops multiple distinct
courses of action, clearly analyzes each from multiple perspectives (including the IMA ethical standards) and provides assumptions made.
Draw Conclusions
(10 pts)
Recommends a course of
action but does not provide adequate/appropriate support or does not include the IMA ethical standards.
Recommends a course of
action and provides support from the IMA ethical standards at a minimum.
Recommends a course of
action and provides compelling support from multiple sources, including the IMA ethical standards.
Writing
(5 pts)
Writing is unclear or
unnecessarily long. Problems with sentence structure, punctuation and vocabulary are
present. Write up is longer than 3 pages, contains more than 2 errors or is submitted in a format other than MS Word.
Writing is clear and
concise. Proper sentence structure, punctuation and vocabulary are generally used. Write up is within the space limits and contains
no more than 2 errors.
Writing is clear and concise.
Proper sentence structure, punctuation and vocabulary are used. Write up is within the space limits and free from errors.
Get Fresh Answer: £40 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,