This paper concentrates on the primary theme of 1. Bibliographic Entry for the article in APA format. (Do not copy the whole reference list. Simply create a reference list entry for your article.) in which you have to explain and evaluate its intricate aspects in detail. In addition to this, this paper has been reviewed and purchased by most of the students hence; it has been rated 4.8 points on the scale of 5 points. Besides, the price of this paper starts from £ 79. For more details and full access to the paper, please refer to the site.
Empirical Scholarly Journal Article Critique
Consider the following questions in your analysis clearly, succinctly, and in your own words.
Be sure to support your statements with thorough explanations and cited references.
Your critique will include the following:
1. Bibliographic Entry for the article in APA format. (Do not copy the whole reference list. Simply create a reference list entry for your article.)
2. Start with a summary of the article. This does not mean copy word for word or explain every detail. No direct quotes should be included.
3. Question being investigated and why the authors think it is interesting.
.
4. Hypothesis being tested, and how it was operationalized (i.e., methodology: independent and dependent variables, control conditions, etc.)
5. Summary of the findings, and how the authors interpreted them
6. The conclusions presented by the authors.
7.. Discuss the merits as well as deficits of the article:
8. Do you think that they asked the question right, and is it an interesting question?
9. Is the hypothesis testable, and does the operationalization make sense? Were the independent and dependent variables well-chosen?
10. Was the report of the findings complete and clear? Do you agree with the interpretations? Why or why not.
11. Was there enough support for the conclusions?
12. Making connections: Does the article add to knowledge in the field?
13. Is it well-balanced or is there bias in the findings?
14. Are there unanswered questions in your mind?
15. What future research would you suggest and why?